Battlefield Heroes Blog - While you wait
The Battlefield Heroes blog posted some information on the new features planned for the site and game. We are guessing they are pretty close to making...
Publish Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:21:34 PDT Read more...
Hype product for 5 months, release beta, have everyone's details stolen, try again. Spend another year making game, jumping up and down waving hoping people will notice you.
I had a spare beta key and pimped it on the forums, everyone cared so little that it sat unused. I think the last time I bothered to click that play now nubbin was about 4 months ago. It was too arcadey and such.
Four maps, three player classes and 24 player limit, why have they done this?
Simple; it's a budget title, aimed at a broader audience.
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Because they wanted to piss off their old core audience by not releasing a good pc game in 5 years, just concentrating on console-shite?
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:No, but it might stop them making more shit.
Well, the proof is in the playing. BF: Bad Company was good, it even came with genuine Beef Rage included. Of course for someone that's willing and able to play ArmA 2 the console versions of Beef might be a little too limited.
spoodie wrote:
Well, the proof is in the playing. BF: Bad Company was good, it even came with genuine Beef Rage included. Of course for someone that's willing and able to play ArmA 2 the console versions of Beef might be a little too limited.
And we'll see if 1943 is any good in September, just seems like it's taking a step back from the epic battles of BF2, and towards gameplay for hyper children.
Until then, I'll stick to the game that gives me many hour battles using tactics and beer.