Shure SE110 Earphones [Bits]
We try out Shure's new entry-level in-ear headphones, which come in at just under £55. Are they worth the cost considering you'll just cover them in wax? We find out by testing them out on some slammin' tunes!
No, they won't be worth it. A magnet/cone combo that small cannot reproduce a full and accurate register simple as. Plus In ear fucks your hearing really fast, and you will block the sound with ear butter. You want good portable sound? Sacrifice a bit of fashion, get some big over-ear cans and go all 80's.
They are good 'phone, but the inability to reproduce accurate sound comes from their size (or rather, the lack of), unless they manage to win physics, it can't happen. The £55 is better spent elsewhere. Like some sennheiser 500 cans, they start around 50 quid.
I'd protest, but all I've done so far as to getting a job is get accepted for selling shit in currys, I guess the nice bonus on big fuck off tv's will ease my pain.
As for the hair? meh, I've had a lifetime of ginger jokes you fat bastard.
Pfft, you got me there. I'm still ginger even when I shave my head/beard and no colour remains. Speaking of shaving, you could try that too, a circular cutter used to trim kebabs should work quite well.
HereComesPete wrote: Does it bring back painful memories?
I don't think I've ever worn headphones like that, my first "walkman" had those orange sponge ones. If I wore those big headphones I might as well carry my stuff around in a record bag and work in new media.
No offence to those that carry their stuff in record bags or work in new media.