An RTS for a RTS n00b

Talk on any game/console that doesn't have its own forum, including browser-based games

Moderator: Forum Moderators

spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

An RTS for a RTS n00b

Post by spoodie »

So Company of Heroes has wetted my appetite for a bit of RTS but it's not got offline at the moment. Which would be a good one for someone who hasn't played properly since before Red Alert? Preferrably not too complicated or in a fantasy setting but I could probably cope if the best one is Warcraft 3 or something. Also has to be good offline.
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Re: An RTS for a RTS n00b

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

spoodie wrote:So Company of Heroes has wetted my appetite for a bit of RTS but it's not got offline at the moment. Which would be a good one for someone who hasn't played properly since before Red Alert? Preferrably not too complicated or in a fantasy setting but I could probably cope if the best one is Warcraft 3 or something. Also has to be good offline.
I heard RA2 was pretty good :)
Nickface
Ninja Pirate
Ninja Pirate
Posts: 1568
Joined: November 15th, 2004, 13:13
Location: Detroit, MI, United States
Contact:

Post by Nickface »

I thought Generals was well put together.
FatherJack
Site Owner
Site Owner
Posts: 9597
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
Location: Coventry, UK
Contact:

Post by FatherJack »

I tend to prefer full 3D ones now, rather than the WarCraft3-style fixed isometric view.

Empire Earth II was quite fun, and since I utterly suck at them, it is good to be able to meddle with the timelines and have my nuclear strikes and big stompy robots up against the CPU's spear-chucking cave-dwellers.

The Microsoft ones are generally good, too and Rome: Scrotal War is good but a bit fiddly - but my favourites are the console ones like Crusaders and Kessen.
cashy
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2024
Joined: May 9th, 2005, 19:43
Location: shropshire

Post by cashy »

FatherJack wrote: nuclear strikes and big stompy robots up against the CPU's spear-chucking cave-dwellers.
:shock: want! :lol:
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

I like the look of Generals, it's not too old and is probably like the RTSs I played years ago.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

I'm an RTS luddite too. The few that I've enjoyed and played for any amount of time are Starcraft (definitely still worth playing) and Ground Control. In fact any of the Blizzard ones are probably a good bet because it's their style to make the single-player storylines interesting.
Hehulk
KHAAAN!
KHAAAN!
Posts: 4746
Joined: April 18th, 2005, 15:36
Location: Bummingham, England
Contact:

Post by Hehulk »

Dog Pants wrote:Ground Control
Win! I love that game. Still play through it from time to time :)
Grimmie
Master of Soviet Propaganda
Master of Soviet Propaganda
Posts: 7672
Joined: February 5th, 2005, 19:00
Location: Birming-humm, England
Contact:

Post by Grimmie »

Age of Empires III is rather good.
Fred Woogle
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2172
Joined: January 12th, 2005, 21:42
Location: Inside the closet cupcake!
Contact:

Post by Fred Woogle »

Grimmie wrote:Age of Empires III is rather good.
:above: this :above:
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

generals/zero hour is really simple to learn. It relies on the standard "get money, build shit, kill other guy" method.
cashy
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2024
Joined: May 9th, 2005, 19:43
Location: shropshire

Post by cashy »

deject wrote:generals/zero hour is really simple to learn. It relies on the standard "get money, build shit, kill other guy" method.
this actualy, i was amazed at how fast i got into it. must have a go again soon. i thought i was amazingly tallented at it, till i went online and got bombarded with 'omfg noob! why r u building defences?!!? build tanks ffs! omfg u need more buildings. i cnt play with this noob!' *l33t kid leaves your team*

still though, single player was fun
Fear
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2032
Joined: August 6th, 2006, 21:45

Post by Fear »

I'd recommend any of the C&C series. All have their good and bad points. Personally I think Generals is one of the worst appart from it is the best one to play mutliplayer. As easy as it is to EA bash, they took it from Westwood and fucked it up (it didn't even have any generals in it until the expansion pack - typical EA money grabbing tossers). It somehow just doesn't feel right. And they bastardised the storyline and the non-cgi videos were great post-generals. And Tanya was hot.

The RTS I am really waiting for now is this:
Supreme Commander

The day it is released I have one of my best mates I lived with at uni coming over for the day and nothing but this game planned. Oh and a visit to the Pub and some point.
Hehulk
KHAAAN!
KHAAAN!
Posts: 4746
Joined: April 18th, 2005, 15:36
Location: Bummingham, England
Contact:

Post by Hehulk »

Fear wrote:The RTS I am really waiting for now is this:
Supreme Commander

The day it is released I have one of my best mates I lived with at uni coming over for the day and nothing but this game planned. Oh and a visit to the Pub and some point.
Oh god, not more mind piss. I'm doing the same. Hmm, mayhaps we should trying and organize a LAN...
Joose
Turret
Turret
Posts: 8090
Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors

Post by Joose »

cashy wrote:
this actualy, i was amazed at how fast i got into it. must have a go again soon. i thought i was amazingly tallented at it, till i went online and got bombarded with 'omfg noob! why r u building defences?!!? build tanks ffs! omfg u need more buildings. i cnt play with this noob!' *l33t kid leaves your team*

still though, single player was fun
normal online sucks teh cock.

5punky online whins.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

Joose wrote:
normal online sucks teh cock.

5punky online whins.
That's 'cos we're all shit :lol:
Joose
Turret
Turret
Posts: 8090
Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors

Post by Joose »

Dog Pants wrote:
That's 'cos we're all shit :lol:
of course :)
Hehulk
KHAAAN!
KHAAAN!
Posts: 4746
Joined: April 18th, 2005, 15:36
Location: Bummingham, England
Contact:

Post by Hehulk »

Dog Pants wrote:
That's 'cos we're all shit :lol:
I'm not that bad :roll:

I just don't know where my disk is. Think I might have left it at Profs at the lan, but tad late now.
pixie pie
Cheese Lord
Cheese Lord
Posts: 838
Joined: July 30th, 2005, 23:46
Location: Cambridge, UK

Post by pixie pie »

I'd have to put a nod in for Rome Scrotal War. I played that for a week of afternoons after college (Yeah, my teachers got a bit pissy for lack of homework that week). The single player campaign is good fun :)
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

It occurs to me that I bought Darwinia about a year ago and that overwhelmed me (or should that be overbelmed?). Not a traditional RTS but pretty much the same thing I think. Did anyone else give it a go?
Post Reply