Is that the one with Casper Van Dien back in it, and big stompy robots?buzzmong wrote:Starship Troopers 3.
Yeah, it's probably worse than the second one. However, it does at least attempt to capture the overtly fascist nature of the Federation, something the original ST book was rather hot about and was missing from the first film.
Movie mini reviews
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Re: Movie mini reviews
-
- Weighted Storage Cube
- Posts: 7167
- Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
- Location: Middle England, nearish Cov
Re: Movie mini reviews
Yus. It is. And very very poor CGI.
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
Re: Movie mini reviews
The CGI in 2 is not too shabby. The storyline is fucking shite. The storyline in 3 is okay and the cgi is like a spastic sicked up some crayons.
Either way, 2 has far more tits in it.
Either way, 2 has far more tits in it.
-
- Mr Flibbles
- Posts: 4957
- Joined: August 10th, 2006, 10:58
- Location: belgium
Re: Movie mini reviews
The Pirates! Band of Misfits
Pirates! Beards! Ham! Brian Blessed!
A charming tale by aardman about a crew of pirates and their leader, the pirate captain (Hugh Grant).
I don't know what it's like in the UK, but here this film is going by woefully unnoticed, there is literally no advertising campaign and I only noticed it was out in the cinema by accident and that's a damn shame as it's a witty, extremely well made claymation tale with tons of genuinely funny gags (a lot of them going on in the background, attentive viewers will be rewarded). It also has a somewhat monkey island vibe, but that might've been me.
Obviously If you're going to put beards, claymation and Brian Blessed in one film I can't dislike it, but you really should see this as it's a damn good film.
Pirates! Beards! Ham! Brian Blessed!
A charming tale by aardman about a crew of pirates and their leader, the pirate captain (Hugh Grant).
I don't know what it's like in the UK, but here this film is going by woefully unnoticed, there is literally no advertising campaign and I only noticed it was out in the cinema by accident and that's a damn shame as it's a witty, extremely well made claymation tale with tons of genuinely funny gags (a lot of them going on in the background, attentive viewers will be rewarded). It also has a somewhat monkey island vibe, but that might've been me.
Obviously If you're going to put beards, claymation and Brian Blessed in one film I can't dislike it, but you really should see this as it's a damn good film.
-
- Weighted Storage Cube
- Posts: 7167
- Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
- Location: Middle England, nearish Cov
Re: Movie mini reviews
Ha, I think I want to watch that one! Yarr!
-
- Mr Flibbles
- Posts: 4957
- Joined: August 10th, 2006, 10:58
- Location: belgium
Re: Movie mini reviews
If you can, avoid the 3D version. We went to the standard 2D version, and I don't see how 3D can make it better (so technically it can't be worse either).
-
- Dr Zoidberg
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: February 8th, 2005, 15:54
- Location: BURMINGHUM, England
- Contact:
Re: Movie mini reviews
The Devil Inside
Promising horror shot in a "Paranormal Activity" style that ultimately fails to be entertaining due to attempting to be too mysterious. Features the worst ending I've ever seen to a film.
2 muffs out of 10.
Promising horror shot in a "Paranormal Activity" style that ultimately fails to be entertaining due to attempting to be too mysterious. Features the worst ending I've ever seen to a film.
2 muffs out of 10.
-
- Berk
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contact:
Re: Movie mini reviews
Horror films are nearly universally shit, so that isn't surprising.
Re: Movie mini reviews
The Cabin in the Woods (2011)*
An interesting and clever twist on the horror genre, not what you'd expect at all. Don't watch the trailer, don't read up on the plot or spoiler filled reviews. Just see it, at the cinema or home later. I'm not saying it's the best film ever, but it's a lot of fun and better if you don't know what's coming.
*Not linking to IMDb for reasons above
/edit
Also, disproving deject's statement above.
An interesting and clever twist on the horror genre, not what you'd expect at all. Don't watch the trailer, don't read up on the plot or spoiler filled reviews. Just see it, at the cinema or home later. I'm not saying it's the best film ever, but it's a lot of fun and better if you don't know what's coming.
*Not linking to IMDb for reasons above
/edit
Also, disproving deject's statement above.
-
- Mr Flibbles
- Posts: 4957
- Joined: August 10th, 2006, 10:58
- Location: belgium
Re: Movie mini reviews
I made the mistake of looking at the trailer after I saw everyone raving about how good it was, and now I'm never looking at trailers again. Fuck you, trailers!
Re: Movie mini reviews
Wow, I just checked the trailer again and it even shows parts of the final act, not cool.Mr. Johnson wrote:I made the mistake of looking at the trailer after I saw everyone raving about how good it was, and now I'm never looking at trailers again. Fuck you, trailers!
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
Re: Movie mini reviews
This was on the BBC website, and while I haven't seen the trailer, just read some of the elements discussed, I echo what one of the posters there said, that I would have had no interest in this film if I hadn't known about the element.
Spoiler:
-
- Berk
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contact:
Re: Movie mini reviews
If you think one example disproves my statement, you clearly don't understand it at all.spoodie wrote:/edit
Also, disproving deject's statement above.
I've never said that there are no good horror movies, but that seems to be what people think I mean. My point is that as a genre it's shit and awful. There will always be exceptions to the rules but that never disproves them.
-
- Turret
- Posts: 8090
- Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
- Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors
Re: Movie mini reviews
Avengers
HnnnnnnnnnnngggggharrrrrrrrrrrghnnnnnnnnuuuuuuuuuuhAMAZEBALLSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnrrrrrrrrrrSOAWESOMEgggggggggrrrrrrrraaaaaaaahFUCKYEAHrgh!
*The noise you are currently hearing is a big comics fan trying not to explode in a torrent of hyperbole. It roughly translates as "Avengers was very good. I shall attempt a more detailed review when I have calmed down".*
HnnnnnnnnnnngggggharrrrrrrrrrrghnnnnnnnnuuuuuuuuuuhAMAZEBALLSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnrrrrrrrrrrSOAWESOMEgggggggggrrrrrrrraaaaaaaahFUCKYEAHrgh!
*The noise you are currently hearing is a big comics fan trying not to explode in a torrent of hyperbole. It roughly translates as "Avengers was very good. I shall attempt a more detailed review when I have calmed down".*
-
- Robotic Bumlord
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
- Location: Manchester, UK
Re: Movie mini reviews
I fucking loved this film. Even with a hurty chest and a cinema filled with cunts (children and persistent rustlers) I enjoyed every second of it. Friend I went to see it with pointed out that there wasn't much of story in comparison to the other films, and the individual characters don't get much development - it's true, but that's what I expected.Joose wrote:Avengers
HnnnnnnnnnnngggggharrrrrrrrrrrghnnnnnnnnuuuuuuuuuuhAMAZEBALLSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnrrrrrrrrrrSOAWESOMEgggggggggrrrrrrrraaaaaaaahFUCKYEAHrgh!
*The noise you are currently hearing is a big comics fan trying not to explode in a torrent of hyperbole. It roughly translates as "Avengers was very good. I shall attempt a more detailed review when I have calmed down".*
It's an action film, and it's a bloody good one. It's also littered with many a geeky reference (I liked the line in the post credits* scene the best of these). Also, whilst the other films were funny, this one had me belly laughing on two separate occasions.
I will undoubtedly see this again very soon.
*You don't have to wait till the end of the credits this time, just a minute or so after the fancy bits.
-
- Turret
- Posts: 8090
- Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
- Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors
Re: Movie mini reviews
On that note:Roman Totale wrote:It's also littered with many a geeky reference (I liked the line in the post credits* scene the best of these).
Spoiler:
Me too. Im dragging the mrs along at some point this week.I will undoubtedly see this again very soon.
-
- Robotic Bumlord
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
- Location: Manchester, UK
Re: Movie mini reviews
Not really a review, but some worthy observations of the film:
A Series of Emails from Prometheus' New Tech Guy
A Series of Emails from Prometheus' New Tech Guy
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Re: Movie mini reviews
Hanna (2011) pleasing.
-
- Berk
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contact:
Re: Movie mini reviews
Agreed. I could have done with fewer stupid camera tricks, but I liked the mix of action and coming-of-age. Plus the Chemical Brothers soundtrack was great too.Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Hanna (2011) pleasing.
-
- Turret
- Posts: 8090
- Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
- Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors
Re: Movie mini reviews
The Amazing Spider-Man
Bloody good. Far better than the last Spidey franchise (and I actually quite liked them. Well, the first two anyway). Its a little grittier than the Tobey Maguire one, not The Dark Knight gritty but not as shiney-pretty cartoony goodness. The guy who plays Peter Parker makes a *much* better Spider-man, really capturing the constant stream of chatting during the fights without it becoming silly, and the outfit looks like something an intelligent teenager could actually put together in his home whilst still being "right" for the character. There were a couple things I noticed which im not sure are plot holes or just things they will explain in the next film (its going to be another trilogy), and although the Lizard was better than I thought it was going to be there was something about his face that just seemed a bit...goofy. I'm not sure the story would hold up by itself, but then I always find origin storys a little dry and it is more than made up for by the decent performances and action scenes.
The only real criticism I have of it is the continuity. Its only a little thing I know, but there are a lot of moments where (for example) a guy takes off his hat, and then takes his hat off again in the next scene, or a door will get smashed and then magically be fixed moments later, or Parker puts his backpack down, jumps off a building, swings across the city, then takes something out of the backpack that he left on the first building. Like I say, they are only little things and every film has them, but god damn there are a lot in this film.
Course, I'm a sod for noticing continuity errors, so most people probably wont notice.
Bloody good. Far better than the last Spidey franchise (and I actually quite liked them. Well, the first two anyway). Its a little grittier than the Tobey Maguire one, not The Dark Knight gritty but not as shiney-pretty cartoony goodness. The guy who plays Peter Parker makes a *much* better Spider-man, really capturing the constant stream of chatting during the fights without it becoming silly, and the outfit looks like something an intelligent teenager could actually put together in his home whilst still being "right" for the character. There were a couple things I noticed which im not sure are plot holes or just things they will explain in the next film (its going to be another trilogy), and although the Lizard was better than I thought it was going to be there was something about his face that just seemed a bit...goofy. I'm not sure the story would hold up by itself, but then I always find origin storys a little dry and it is more than made up for by the decent performances and action scenes.
The only real criticism I have of it is the continuity. Its only a little thing I know, but there are a lot of moments where (for example) a guy takes off his hat, and then takes his hat off again in the next scene, or a door will get smashed and then magically be fixed moments later, or Parker puts his backpack down, jumps off a building, swings across the city, then takes something out of the backpack that he left on the first building. Like I say, they are only little things and every film has them, but god damn there are a lot in this film.
Course, I'm a sod for noticing continuity errors, so most people probably wont notice.