Spec me some decent in-ear headphones, bitches!

If you touch your software enough does it become hardware?

Moderator: Forum Moderators

TezzRexx
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4072
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 15:54
Location: BURMINGHUM, England
Contact:

Spec me some decent in-ear headphones, bitches!

Post by TezzRexx »

Basically, I keep destroying headphones after about 2-3 months, if that, of use.

More often then not the wire comes loose. probably because i keep putting them in my pocket, getting them out, wrapping them around the mp3 player etc.

Do you bros know of any that are highly durable?

TA!
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

Just buy the most expensive Shures you can afford :)
HereComesPete
Throbbing Cupcake
Throbbing Cupcake
Posts: 10249
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
Location: The maleboge

Post by HereComesPete »

Shure. Cheaper but okay are those gumi things, mediocre sound but quite survivable. I tend to buy cheap ones for travel and keep my nice set for bumming around the house with.

Don't coil the 'phones around anything, it nacks the wires and that nacks the quality. It takes time, but unplugging and packing them away when it's not in use saves them too.
ProfHawking
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2101
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 21:31

Post by ProfHawking »

I have some sennheiser cx300, they are cheap but decent enough I think.

I dont have stupid audiophile ears, but who actually does? And anyway, spending 100x the price for 1% quality difference - doesn't make sense to me.
Stoat
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3291
Joined: October 8th, 2004, 15:48
Location: Sheffield, UK
Contact:

Post by Stoat »

I've got some nice Sennheisers. They were quite cheap, but that's fine for me since my earphone quality check is boolean:
Tinny As Fuck : Yes/No
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

ProfHawking wrote:I have some sennheiser cx300, they are cheap but decent enough I think.

I dont have stupid audiophile ears, but who actually does? And anyway, spending 100x the price for 1% quality difference - doesn't make sense to me.
It's very, very rarely that bad, very worst you'll get to 10x-15x the price, from decent to outstanding, but you'll hear a significant difference, assuming you're not listening to shitty mp3s (protip:192k is minimum if you have a soul) I also don't have anything like audiophile ears, but I can appreciate the quality of the noise going into my head.

Course, as they're in ear things, you don't really need to spend too much for something decent enough. £30 should be plenty.
MrGreen
Shambler
Shambler
Posts: 690
Joined: January 5th, 2007, 14:14
Location: Newcastle/ London

Post by MrGreen »

http://www.amazon.co.uk/JVC-HA-FX33BE-M ... B000N3ZHDO

Best in ear monitors I've used, outside of the top two Shures, especially if you perform the Kramer mod on them. They're mildly indistructable, and so cheap that if they do break, it's not exactly awful.
MrGreen
Shambler
Shambler
Posts: 690
Joined: January 5th, 2007, 14:14
Location: Newcastle/ London

Post by MrGreen »

You can probably get them cheaper elsewhere, too.
buzzmong
Weighted Storage Cube
Weighted Storage Cube
Posts: 7167
Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
Location: Middle England, nearish Cov

Post by buzzmong »

I've got a set of some Sony's. They were about £25 quid about 3/4 years ago, I use them most days and they're doing fine. Sound is alright as well.
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

Yeah the problem with really good headphones is that you need really good audio source for it to be worth the money. If you're listening to 192k MP3s, I would not spend more than $40-50 (£20-30) on headphones. More than that and you will curse your decision because you'll hear the artifacting of the MP3 with incredible accuracy.
buzzmong
Weighted Storage Cube
Weighted Storage Cube
Posts: 7167
Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
Location: Middle England, nearish Cov

Post by buzzmong »

Well, on the assumption they're going to be used for travelling, unless you get noiseless ones (which make some people feel seasick), source quality isn't a major issue as you'll still have outside sounds permeating in.
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

That is what I love about the Shure-type earphones, when you get a good seal the outside world will be shut out entirely.
Sol
Ninja
Ninja
Posts: 1450
Joined: December 9th, 2004, 19:27
Location: Behind the sofa, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Post by Sol »

Can't be tempted by a set of porta pros?

Image

That shit is whack. £17 too.
buzzmong
Weighted Storage Cube
Weighted Storage Cube
Posts: 7167
Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
Location: Middle England, nearish Cov

Post by buzzmong »

Isn't that a bit dangerous though? I for one like to know if trucks/buses/emergency services/Chicken/Berk/Fatties etc are coming from the side or behind*.


<sub>Yes, I know.</sub>
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

What you want is some AKG K-1000s. :)
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

buzzmong wrote:Isn't that a bit dangerous though? I for one like to know if trucks/buses/emergency services/Chicken/Berk/Fatties etc are coming from the side or behind*.


<sub>Yes, I know.</sub>
Yes it is dangerous if you're out and about walking in traffic but if you're on a plane or a train or riding in a car/bus it's great.
HereComesPete
Throbbing Cupcake
Throbbing Cupcake
Posts: 10249
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
Location: The maleboge

Post by HereComesPete »

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:What you want is some AKG K-1000s. :)

:lol: Ideal really, a bargain given the quality, and they look good different.
randomgazz
Unicorn
Unicorn
Posts: 303
Joined: December 4th, 2004, 13:18
Location: Manchester

Post by randomgazz »

ProfHawking wrote:I have some sennheiser cx300, they are cheap but decent enough I think.
I had these and then lost them and got the CX500s

Both seem good for the cash, amazon seems to have been the cheapest I've found them.
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

randomgazz wrote:I had these and then lost them and got the CX500s
These might have to be my next purchase when my current CX300s break. Now I just have to make sure they break.
FatherJack
Site Owner
Site Owner
Posts: 9597
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
Location: Coventry, UK
Contact:

Post by FatherJack »

spoodie wrote:Now I just have to make sure they break.
Leave them on the sofa and invite chicken round for a game of musical chairs.
Post Reply