Spec me some decent in-ear headphones, bitches!
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Dr Zoidberg
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: February 8th, 2005, 15:54
- Location: BURMINGHUM, England
- Contact:
Spec me some decent in-ear headphones, bitches!
Basically, I keep destroying headphones after about 2-3 months, if that, of use.
More often then not the wire comes loose. probably because i keep putting them in my pocket, getting them out, wrapping them around the mp3 player etc.
Do you bros know of any that are highly durable?
TA!
More often then not the wire comes loose. probably because i keep putting them in my pocket, getting them out, wrapping them around the mp3 player etc.
Do you bros know of any that are highly durable?
TA!
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
Shure. Cheaper but okay are those gumi things, mediocre sound but quite survivable. I tend to buy cheap ones for travel and keep my nice set for bumming around the house with.
Don't coil the 'phones around anything, it nacks the wires and that nacks the quality. It takes time, but unplugging and packing them away when it's not in use saves them too.
Don't coil the 'phones around anything, it nacks the wires and that nacks the quality. It takes time, but unplugging and packing them away when it's not in use saves them too.
-
- Zombie
- Posts: 2101
- Joined: February 20th, 2005, 21:31
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
It's very, very rarely that bad, very worst you'll get to 10x-15x the price, from decent to outstanding, but you'll hear a significant difference, assuming you're not listening to shitty mp3s (protip:192k is minimum if you have a soul) I also don't have anything like audiophile ears, but I can appreciate the quality of the noise going into my head.ProfHawking wrote:I have some sennheiser cx300, they are cheap but decent enough I think.
I dont have stupid audiophile ears, but who actually does? And anyway, spending 100x the price for 1% quality difference - doesn't make sense to me.
Course, as they're in ear things, you don't really need to spend too much for something decent enough. £30 should be plenty.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/JVC-HA-FX33BE-M ... B000N3ZHDO
Best in ear monitors I've used, outside of the top two Shures, especially if you perform the Kramer mod on them. They're mildly indistructable, and so cheap that if they do break, it's not exactly awful.
Best in ear monitors I've used, outside of the top two Shures, especially if you perform the Kramer mod on them. They're mildly indistructable, and so cheap that if they do break, it's not exactly awful.
-
- Berk
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contact:
Yeah the problem with really good headphones is that you need really good audio source for it to be worth the money. If you're listening to 192k MP3s, I would not spend more than $40-50 (£20-30) on headphones. More than that and you will curse your decision because you'll hear the artifacting of the MP3 with incredible accuracy.
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Berk
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contact:
Yes it is dangerous if you're out and about walking in traffic but if you're on a plane or a train or riding in a car/bus it's great.buzzmong wrote:Isn't that a bit dangerous though? I for one like to know if trucks/buses/emergency services/Chicken/Berk/Fatties etc are coming from the side or behind*.
<sub>Yes, I know.</sub>
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
-
- Unicorn
- Posts: 303
- Joined: December 4th, 2004, 13:18
- Location: Manchester
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact: