Page 1 of 2
CS_5punk_Assault *DONE* *FINAL* *FINISHED*
Posted: March 12th, 2005, 21:45
by Dr. kitteny berk
ok, that's done, final complete and finished.
we've spent many million hours on this.
we don't give fuck about any known issues.
www.hairy-arse.com/assault_done.rar (5.5mb,
unzips to 77mb)
place both the .bsp and .nav into C:\Valve\Steam\SteamApps\your@email.com\counter-strike source\cstrike\maps
Re: CS_5punk_Assault *DONE* *FINAL* *FINISHED*
Posted: March 13th, 2005, 4:29
by deject
Dr. Kitteny Berk wrote: unzips to 77mb
Posted: March 13th, 2005, 4:31
by Dr. kitteny berk
fly around with noclip on
there's more than a little complex lighting etc going on there.
Posted: March 13th, 2005, 20:04
by Sol
Posted: March 13th, 2005, 20:15
by Jinxx
Soloman wrote:*pats berk on the back*
It's not all his work you know!
..
Posted: March 13th, 2005, 20:54
by viper_2090
BARRELS!!!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Posted: March 13th, 2005, 20:58
by Dr. kitteny berk
Jinxx wrote:Soloman wrote:*pats berk on the back*
It's not all his work you know!
indeed not, very much a joint effort between Jinxx and I
Posted: March 14th, 2005, 18:58
by Sol
*apologizes*
*gives berk and jinxx gold stars*
Posted: March 14th, 2005, 19:08
by Jinxx
Soloman wrote:*gives berk and jinxx gold stars*
*belms*
Re: CS_5punk_Assault *DONE* *FINAL* *FINISHED*
Posted: March 14th, 2005, 21:55
by TezzRexx
ZOMG ZOMG!!
seriously though, 77MB?! how did you get that to 5.5mb's?!
Re: CS_5punk_Assault *DONE* *FINAL* *FINISHED*
Posted: March 14th, 2005, 22:02
by deject
TezzRexx wrote:
ZOMG ZOMG!!
seriously though, 77MB?! how did you get that to 5.5mb's?!
RAR can be quite efficient...
I've heard that 7-zip can do better, but no one uses it.
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 3:09
by Dr. kitteny berk
as deject said, RAR is bloody efficient used right, and bsps are totally uncompressed, so have a lot of potential for shrinkage.
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 11:30
by Woo Elephant Yeah
Could you provide a 150x150 screenshot for me please
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 12:37
by comrade yannnovski
Dr. Kitteny Berk wrote:so have a lot of potential for shrinkage.
much like me in a cold swimming pool
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 17:47
by TezzRexx
Damn right bloody efficient!! I mean, winZips normally take about 3megs off the file size! O.O If only we used RARs at college, it would be so easier to take in/email work.
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 18:07
by Dr. kitteny berk
the zip version (as sent to the providers) was more like 7.5mb.
mostly just a case of BSPs being very, very compressable.
i'll try with 7-zip too
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 18:27
by Dr. kitteny berk
ok, you made me do this
all files archived at "best" or "ultra"
7z (LZMA) = 4,563KB
7z (Bz2) = 5,938KB
rar = 5,627KB
zip = 7,861KB
whatever, most people can handle rar files, so that's what i'll use
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 18:46
by Jinxx
I did a few tests too:
lha = 8,227KB
tar.z = 11,979KB
tar.gz = 7,852KB
tar.bz2 = 5,902KB
sitx = 6,857KB
I declare 7z (LZMA) the winner!
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 20:47
by deject
it really is too bad that 7-zip is so unknown...
Posted: March 15th, 2005, 21:10
by Dr. kitteny berk
indeed, i think it's mostly due to rar being pretty good as is.
rar does support huge files, which is why people moved away from zip originally, so there's no real need for people to move from rar to 7zip just yet.
