Page 1 of 2
Good Morning, Megan Fox: Exclusive Video
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 11:00
by News Reader
Good Morning, Megan Fox: Exclusive Video
Not really tech related, but I had to share.
Publish Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 01:05:00 CDT
Read more...
Source: [H]ardOCP News/Article Feed
Description: News/Article Feed for [H]ardOCP
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 13:23
by fabyak
She was in a film, which uses techology, which makes it techy enough for me!
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 13:29
by amblin
.
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 13:47
by spoodie
I'll make a mental note of this thread, to review in private.
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 13:56
by buzzmong
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 14:06
by Dr. kitteny berk
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 18:46
by HereComesPete
Oh dear, she has tattoo's so that means amblin can't like her.
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 20:57
by amblin
.
Posted: May 5th, 2009, 21:40
by HereComesPete
You fail, they add to the sexeh!
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 6:25
by Mr. Johnson
I'm divided on the tattoos on girls issue, some tattoos on certain places can indeed be sexy, but when they're tattooed like a rockstar with virtually not a single place left that isn't scribbled on, just no.
I also have a dislike for colour tattoos, they just seem wrong.
Oh, and words, they don't belong on people either, just pictures.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 6:43
by Dog Pants
Mr. Johnson wrote:I'm divided on the tattoos on girls issue, some tattoos on certain places can indeed be sexy, but when they're tattooed like a rockstar with virtually not a single place left that isn't scribbled on, just no.
I also have a dislike for colour tattoos, they just seem wrong.
Oh, and words, they don't belong on people either, just pictures.
Apart from the colour thing (I don't care as long as it looks right) I agree. I like them (on a partner) in places where nobody else gets to see them.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 8:38
by spoodie
amblin wrote:Such a beautiful girl and yet still she feels the need for that. I'll never, ever understand it myself.
I'm with amblin on this one. With a body like that it just seems like defacing. Although I'm sure she really doesn't care about our opinions either way.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 9:39
by Mr. Johnson
More so the fact that it's shit poems she had tattooed. Silly fox!
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 10:13
by deject
I think tattoos can go either way. If they're artistic or look cool then they're okay, but the ones she has are just retarded. Still, she is so hot it doesn't matter.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 10:22
by FatherJack
Who?
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 10:40
by ProfHawking
Personally, i think good tattos can be quite sexy. However most arent good, and that one is just lame.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 11:02
by Grimmie
I think if it came down to a "Would" or "Wouldn't" situation I'm not going to care what she has written on the side of her.
Christ, she could have Dante's Inferno scribed down the inside of her left leg and one half of her buttock - still bloody would.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 11:48
by Dr. kitteny berk
Tattoos are good, providing they're there for a half decent reason, not just stupid fashion things like star tattoos on a wrist.
Piercings are good everywhere, visible ones in moderation.
Less visible ones, well as many as well fit is good
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 12:20
by amblin
.
Posted: May 6th, 2009, 12:26
by Dr. kitteny berk
I'm not too fussed by tribals.
Just one on an arm or something looks shit, but once there's a fair few of them I don't think they're at all bad.
