Good Morning, Megan Fox: Exclusive Video

News Reader · Post by **News Reader** » May 5th, 2009, 11:00

Good Morning, Megan Fox: Exclusive Video
Not really tech related, but I had to share.

Publish Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 01:05:00 CDT
Read more...

Source: [H]ardOCP News/Article Feed
Description: News/Article Feed for [H]ardOCP

Post by **fabyak** » May 5th, 2009, 13:23

She was in a film, which uses techology, which makes it techy enough for me!

amblin · Post by **amblin** » May 5th, 2009, 13:29

spoodie · Post by **spoodie** » May 5th, 2009, 13:47

I'll make a mental note of this thread, to review in private.

buzzmong · Post by **buzzmong** » May 5th, 2009, 13:56

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » May 5th, 2009, 14:06

Post by **HereComesPete** » May 5th, 2009, 18:46

Oh dear, she has tattoo's so that means amblin can't like her.

amblin · Post by **amblin** » May 5th, 2009, 20:57

Post by **HereComesPete** » May 5th, 2009, 21:40

You fail, they add to the sexeh!

Mr. Johnson · Post by **Mr. Johnson** » May 6th, 2009, 6:25

I'm divided on the tattoos on girls issue, some tattoos on certain places can indeed be sexy, but when they're tattooed like a rockstar with virtually not a single place left that isn't scribbled on, just no.
I also have a dislike for colour tattoos, they just seem wrong.
Oh, and words, they don't belong on people either, just pictures.

Post by **Dog Pants** » May 6th, 2009, 6:43

Mr. Johnson wrote:I'm divided on the tattoos on girls issue, some tattoos on certain places can indeed be sexy, but when they're tattooed like a rockstar with virtually not a single place left that isn't scribbled on, just no.
I also have a dislike for colour tattoos, they just seem wrong.
Oh, and words, they don't belong on people either, just pictures.

Apart from the colour thing (I don't care as long as it looks right) I agree. I like them (on a partner) in places where nobody else gets to see them.

spoodie · Post by **spoodie** » May 6th, 2009, 8:38

amblin wrote:Such a beautiful girl and yet still she feels the need for that. I'll never, ever understand it myself.

I'm with amblin on this one. With a body like that it just seems like defacing. Although I'm sure she really doesn't care about our opinions either way.

Mr. Johnson · Post by **Mr. Johnson** » May 6th, 2009, 9:39

More so the fact that it's shit poems she had tattooed. Silly fox!

Post by **deject** » May 6th, 2009, 10:13

I think tattoos can go either way. If they're artistic or look cool then they're okay, but the ones she has are just retarded. Still, she is so hot it doesn't matter.

Post by **FatherJack** » May 6th, 2009, 10:22

Who?

Post by **ProfHawking** » May 6th, 2009, 10:40

Personally, i think good tattos can be quite sexy. However most arent good, and that one is just lame.

Post by **Grimmie** » May 6th, 2009, 11:02

I think if it came down to a "Would" or "Wouldn't" situation I'm not going to care what she has written on the side of her.
Christ, she could have Dante's Inferno scribed down the inside of her left leg and one half of her buttock - still bloody would.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » May 6th, 2009, 11:48

Tattoos are good, providing they're there for a half decent reason, not just stupid fashion things like star tattoos on a wrist.

Piercings are good everywhere, visible ones in moderation.

Less visible ones, well as many as well fit is good

amblin · Post by **amblin** » May 6th, 2009, 12:20

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » May 6th, 2009, 12:26

I'm not too fussed by tribals.

Just one on an arm or something looks shit, but once there's a fair few of them I don't think they're at all bad.