Page 1 of 2
Red Dwarf.
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 0:12
by Dr. kitteny berk
THE NEW ONE'S ON ON FUCKING FRIDAY.
9pm, dave.
that is all.
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 0:40
by Stoat
I will be watching.
I fear I may be watching through my fingers, clamped across my face, but I will be watching none-the-less.
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 6:37
by Mr. Johnson
This is broadcast on satellite or something, correct?
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 6:40
by Dr. kitteny berk
Pretty much.
Still, it'll end up on the floor within seconds.

Posted: April 9th, 2009, 7:00
by Mr. Johnson
Then all is excellent.

Posted: April 9th, 2009, 11:07
by spoodie
In the calendar as I
will forget.

Posted: April 9th, 2009, 12:46
by cheeseandham
Dave is on terrestrial tv these days
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 12:49
by Fear
Shame it wont be in HD (well I don't think Dave has an HD output, does it?)
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 12:49
by amblin
.
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 13:12
by Mr. Johnson
The internets will no doubt provide me with what I need.
Posted: April 9th, 2009, 17:41
by Lateralus
I am so excited about this it's untrue. I know it went out with a whimper more than a bang, but nevertheless, woo and yay!
Posted: April 10th, 2009, 23:31
by Dr. kitteny berk
Well. I'm not sure.
Posted: April 10th, 2009, 23:42
by Stoat
Limp cliffhanger suggests it was imagined as a feature-length episode. I guess you work with what you're given. The BBC were clearly not going to touch it.
I got a couple of laughs out of it though. It could have been much, much worse.
Posted: April 10th, 2009, 23:44
by Dr. kitteny berk
Agreed.
CGI skutters is bad, but I can understand for budget and time.
Posted: April 10th, 2009, 23:52
by buzzmong
Oddly, I think the lack off the naff sets takes away from it as they always seemed somewhat more real.
Well, they explained Holly's absence in typical Red Dwarf fashion, did I miss something about Kochanski at the end of the last series though? As that seemed a bit "whut?".
Definitely a setup episode though, hopefully the next two will be better.
Posted: April 11th, 2009, 0:00
by spoodie
I thought it was a good as could be expected. I enjoyed it and had a few laughs. At least it wasn't offensively bad.
Posted: April 11th, 2009, 0:18
by Fear
Hmmmm. Not as good as the older ones.
I think the actors perform better in front of a live audience, it felt wooden almost without the studio-audience-ness and the laughter track.
Posted: April 11th, 2009, 0:28
by Roman Totale
Fear wrote:I think the actors perform better in front of a live audience, it felt wooden almost without the studio-audience-ness and the laughter track.
I concur.
Posted: April 11th, 2009, 0:45
by Dr. kitteny berk
Yup.
Posted: April 11th, 2009, 0:50
by ProfHawking
i cant say i wasnt dissapointed.
The plot seemed overly simple/missing bits, and the acting seemed forced and not as enthusiastic.
I agree with the lack of studio audience didnt help, and i think they were relying too much on the cgi stuff to bring it to life.
Not sure exactly what i was expecting, but i think it was more than that. Will see what they turn out next time.