Fantasy Formula 1
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Fantasy Formula 1
I wouldn't normally go for this myself, but as I've set up a team in Pro Fantasy F1 with some mates anyway, I thought I'd see if there was any interest here for another 5punky league? I don't really follow F1 much, but I know that at least one 5punker loves it, and there may be some closet fans here too, so any interest?
-
FatherJack
- Site Owner

- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
-
buzzmong
- Weighted Storage Cube

- Posts: 7167
- Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
- Location: Middle England, nearish Cov
Nah, FIA have done some odd things with the rules this year anyway with regards to the cars, and the new team is by all appearances at testing recently, going to be on level with the top teams for performance.Baliame wrote:This really has little to no point, you just take Hamilton and the two Ferraris and win.
Also new season starting this weekend so GO MASSA.
As long as the FIA stop pandering to Ferrari it might be a good season. Trivia for you: Last year McLaren were stripped of points for using Ferrari testing data, did you know Ferrari themselves ran an illegal car due to some sprung underpan for 4 races at the start and were never penalised for it?
Most amusing.
-
Dr. kitteny berk
- Morbo

- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
I was about to mention this, along with other fucked up rules that are pretty terrible, IMO.buzzmong wrote:Nah, FIA have done some odd things with the rules this year anyway with regards to the cars, and the new team is by all appearances at testing recently, going to be on level with the top teams for performance.
-
HereComesPete
- Throbbing Cupcake

- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
I was going to give it a bash, but it wants my address and phone number. I can't see any reason why I should provide anything other than my email address.
Incidentally, they reversed the new rules on scoring last week so it's still the same as last season. Also, the diffuser thing is a rules squabble over what constitutes a hole.
/listened to Martin Brundle on the radio earlier
Incidentally, they reversed the new rules on scoring last week so it's still the same as last season. Also, the diffuser thing is a rules squabble over what constitutes a hole.
/listened to Martin Brundle on the radio earlier
-
FatherJack
- Site Owner

- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
Fair enough. Right, well that seems remarkably easy to make an almost exclusively Ferrari team, but The Anthill Mob is ready to roll. With Ferrari constructor, engine, and top driver (Massa), I'm surprisingly well equipped. I think this will come down to the lower end drivers. There's also the McLaren wildcard - if this diffuser thing goes against them it could fuck them right up, but if not it might give them a real advantage. However, I think it will go against them, and even if it doesn't the other teams will probably have copied it by mid season.
So in fact my hopes are resting on Fisichella.
So in fact my hopes are resting on Fisichella.
-
Dr. kitteny berk
- Morbo

- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Yeah, but cars are fuckall if your driver's along the lines of Takuma Sato.buzzmong wrote:Nah, FIA have done some odd things with the rules this year anyway with regards to the cars, and the new team is by all appearances at testing recently, going to be on level with the top teams for performance.
Except when they're only taken in because they bring engine companies with them.buzzmong wrote:I disagree unfortunately, they're all talented drivers in F1, they have to be to get into F1, it's just the cars make such a massive difference.
Take Hamilton, if he hadn't have been at McLaren (or, say, Ferrari) he wouldn't have won as many races as he did, if any at all.
And would you stop proving me wrong already?
-
FatherJack
- Site Owner

- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:




