whats so special about DoD

Where we come together to shoot 5punk.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
killslay
Head Crab
Head Crab
Posts: 431
Joined: April 19th, 2005, 0:04
Location: ayrshire, scotland
Contact:

whats so special about DoD

Post by killslay »

why should i get it, how different is it from counterstrike: source and is it worth paying money for?
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Re: whats so special about DoD

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

killslay wrote:how different is it from counterstrike: source
They both use the source engine...
killslay
Head Crab
Head Crab
Posts: 431
Joined: April 19th, 2005, 0:04
Location: ayrshire, scotland
Contact:

Post by killslay »

so its basically cs with different skins and weapons?
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

killslay wrote:so its basically cs with different skins and weapons?
And a feather duster.
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

killslay wrote:so its basically cs with different skins and weapons?
Ok, before i decide to hurt you.

the engine is the same, that's all, everything else is different.
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

ah, hurt him anyway, apple style!

whether it's worth paying for depends on whether you will like it so that's hard to answer. I don't usually go for WW2 shooters and I like it but I had silver steam account from the beginning
Joose
Turret
Turret
Posts: 8090
Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors

Post by Joose »

Yes, yes, its totally different.

Apart from the fact they are both Source powered games, both FPS's, both team based, both with the two sides having different weapons, and both with the basic idea being to shoot the opposing team, they are utterly different.

</sarcasm>
FatherJack
Site Owner
Site Owner
Posts: 9597
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
Location: Coventry, UK
Contact:

Post by FatherJack »

The "feel" is much the same as CS, by which I mean the instinctive way you control the character without really realising you're doing it - I imagine that if DoDS was a UT2004 modification I would find it harder to switch between them.

The weapons are very similar to those used in other WW2-based games, so playing CoD, RtCW or even the original DoD give a reasonable indication of what to expect from a given weapon in terms of clip size and accuracy.

Some games try to just be fragfests, while others aim for a more realistic feel, which sort of started with Soldier of Fortune, which featured leaning around corners and specific body-area damage for the first time, but most try for a happy medium where the realism doesn't hamper the gameplay.

If you imagine a "speedometer of realism" with something like Serious Sam at 0 and America's Army or BF1942 (which try to be "combat simulators") at 100, I would put CSS at 50 and DoDS at 60.

In any case I would recommend delaying a buying decision until after CoD2 is released. Most people here seem to be treating DoDS as a bit of a stopgap until that comes along or as a new shiny toy, once they are both out I suspect 5cheduled games will be dominated by CoD2, and it's always nice to have someone to actually play with.
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

It's true - CoD owns you all

/hasn't actually played DoD
Post Reply