Virgin vs Sky
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Heavy
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: October 10th, 2004, 17:36
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Contact:
-
- Sir Didymus
- Posts: 354
- Joined: December 9th, 2006, 1:12
thats good to know, didn't have any trouble with it on my netgear router either. i found four wireless networks round here, only one of which is unsecured and it's too weak to useWoo Elephant Yeah wrote:Just so you know, the Wii connected straight away to the Sky Wireless Modem without any problems whatsoever.
-
- Robotic Despot
- Posts: 4595
- Joined: October 14th, 2004, 21:35
- Location: Sitting in a tin can
- Contact:
YepHehulk wrote:
My understanding of it (Which I'm reasonably sure I heard from Bobbins, so if he corrects me, that's why) was that Virgin refused to pay the ubsurd costs assotiated with that one channel, so cut it from their services. Can't say I'm complaining, as nightly simpsons every day for 10 years got really realy old
Sky said "OMG liek Sky One is frickin awesome, give us more pennies per subscriber per day cos The Simpsons, 24 and Lost are worth loads of money, but only these shows, no-one watches anything else"
Virgin said "Get fucked"
Sky said "ZOMG Toys out of pram, REMOVE ALL SKY CHANELZ"
I hate Rupert Murdoch, News Corp and Sky. Despite this we now have Sky+ in our new flat and awaiting sky broadband connection. Broken moral compass FTW