Halo 2, Shadowrun made playable on XP

Talk on any game/console that doesn't have its own forum, including browser-based games

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
News Reader
Salmon Ninja Pirate Gayer
Salmon Ninja Pirate Gayer
Posts: 1215
Joined: December 13th, 2006, 14:27

Halo 2, Shadowrun made playable on XP

Post by News Reader »

Image Halo 2, Shadowrun made playable on XP
Filed under: Hacks, PC, Microsoft Xbox 360, First Person Shooters, Online
ImageFalling Leaf Studios is mad as hell and not going to take it anymore. What has caused them ire? Microsoft making Halo 2 and Shadowrun Fista-only. So they decided to make them XP-compatible.

The company is promising that if you buy one of the games through Amazon via the links on their page, then they will send you for free their initial release of compatibility software that will let you"run these Windows Fista titles on Windows XP," they claim.

Said Falling Leaf Systems CEO Brian Thomason, "first [Microsoft] claim that it was impossible to implement DirectX 10 compatibility atop Windows XP, and now they also want us to believe that they couldn't successfully launch two DirectX 9 based titles on XP either. We plan to expose both theories as patently false."

We're not sure if the software will work as planned, or how Microsoft might try to prevent the games from going online. The expected shipment date is "within a few months," according to their press release; the pre-order page estimates late July.

[Via Xbox 360 Fanboy]Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

SPONSORED BY: Age of Empires III - Real-Time Strategy Game Control a European power on a quest to colonize and conquer the New World. AOE3 introduces new gameplay elements, as well as new civilizations, units, and technologies. http://www.ageofempires3.com/


Author: Ross Miller
Category: bungiefalling leaffalling leaf systemsFallingLeafFallingLeafSystemshalohalo 2Halo2microsoftshadow runShadowRunwindowsxbox
Read more...

Source: Joystiq
Description: Joystiq
Image
FatherJack
Site Owner
Site Owner
Posts: 9597
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
Location: Coventry, UK
Contact:

Post by FatherJack »

Heh, no doubt they'll be blocked from live.
Last edited by FatherJack on June 12th, 2007, 10:54, edited 1 time in total.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

Live can suck my merrily oscillating scrotum.
ProfHawking
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2101
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 21:31

Post by ProfHawking »

Dog Pants wrote:Live can suck my merrily oscillating scrotum.
:above:

M$ in all their annoying bitchiness as possible
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

Live sucks on Windows but is great on Xboxes. If was implemented properly on the PC it would also be good but then there is the greater chance of selfish idiots hacking it on the PC destroying the experience for everyone else.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

You have to pay for it don't you? This fact alone makes it unappealing to me, seeing as I can play similar games for free without Live.
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

Dog Pants wrote:You have to pay for it don't you? This fact alone makes it unappealing to me, seeing as I can play similar games for free without Live.
Yes and in the PC world it's mostly redundant as there are other services and applications that already do job that Live tries to. But on the Xbox it's definitely worth the £40/year. If MS can tweak and secure the Live service to suit Windows then it could be worth it but at the moment it's probably not.
eion
Grammar Nazi
Grammar Nazi
Posts: 1511
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 22:23
Location: Beijing
Contact:

Post by eion »

Of course if you have Live for your xbox 360, you have it for Windows too. That's better than nothing.
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

eion wrote:Of course if you have Live for your xbox 360, you have it for Windows too. That's better than nothing.
That was my understanding but it's not really much use yet.
Fear
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2032
Joined: August 6th, 2006, 21:45

Post by Fear »

I can see no reason to limit DirectX 10 to Fista other than to horse people to upgrade.

What other possible reason is there?

Nice one Falling Leaf...
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

hahaha, most execllent!
buzzmong
Weighted Storage Cube
Weighted Storage Cube
Posts: 7167
Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
Location: Middle England, nearish Cov

Post by buzzmong »

Fear wrote:I can see no reason to limit DirectX 10 to Fista other than to horse people to upgrade.

What other possible reason is there?

Nice one Falling Leaf...

This is why not many people (more like none) are developing games for Fista.

From a business sense a huge portion of the market has 2000/XP compatible machines, and a tiny tiny fraction have Fista, let alone anything made for fista will not (supposedly) work on XP. I certainly know which OS I'd be chucking hundreds of thousdands (maybe millions) of development money at if I'd want to make some dosh back.
Post Reply