Flock (browser) Beta
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Flock (browser) Beta
Just came across this - http://www.flock.com
Firefox/Mozilla based browser, with built in support for soloman*
Apparently uses less memory than firefox and has a blobby skin.
*intergrated[sic] features such as direct Blog support (Blogger, Drupal, LiveJournal, MoveableType, Typepad and WordPress supported)
Firefox/Mozilla based browser, with built in support for soloman*
Apparently uses less memory than firefox and has a blobby skin.
*intergrated[sic] features such as direct Blog support (Blogger, Drupal, LiveJournal, MoveableType, Typepad and WordPress supported)
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
-
- Ninja Pirate
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: July 17th, 2005, 13:29
- Location: Saaaarfampton
Re: Flock (browser) Beta
FIX'DDr. kitteny berk wrote:Just came across this - http://www.flock.com
Firefox/Mozilla based browser, with built in support for soloman*
Apparently uses less memory than firefox and has a blobby skin.
*intergrated[sic] EMO Picture angleisation, de-colourisation and posting on myspace
Re: Flock (browser) Beta
Anhamgrimmar wrote:FIX'DDr. kitteny berk wrote:Just came across this - http://www.flock.com
Firefox/Mozilla based browser, with built in support for soloman*
Apparently uses less memory than firefox and has a blobby skin.
*intergrated[sic] EMO Picture angleisation, de-colourisation and posting on myspace
And Noia: Arrrggghhhhh!!
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
Been using Flock for the last couple of days, works with my Firefox plugins like Mouse Gestures, but makes the toolbar entries a bit wide.
Might be alright for the popular blog users (myspace) and other people who have the delusion that anyone is interested in them or their bookmarks (delicious, shadow) the way it posts images is thusly:
Photobucket<a title="d_a_tt_spaz.jpg" href="http://s10.photobucket.com/albums/a115/ ... .jpg"><img src="http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a115/ ... t_spaz.jpg" border="0"></a> Flickr<a title="S5000079" href="http://flickr.com/photos/29949792@N00/226397897"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/79/226397897_655ebbe68b_m.jpg" border="0"></a>
It's a piece of piss to do, but could use a lot more control about how it decides on thumbnail size, etc and the ability to use BBcode would be good. I would much rather it were a Firefox plugin than a complete browser replacement, but I see some mileage in it, for when I can't be arsed.
Might be alright for the popular blog users (myspace) and other people who have the delusion that anyone is interested in them or their bookmarks (delicious, shadow) the way it posts images is thusly:
Photobucket<a title="d_a_tt_spaz.jpg" href="http://s10.photobucket.com/albums/a115/ ... .jpg"><img src="http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a115/ ... t_spaz.jpg" border="0"></a> Flickr<a title="S5000079" href="http://flickr.com/photos/29949792@N00/226397897"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/79/226397897_655ebbe68b_m.jpg" border="0"></a>
It's a piece of piss to do, but could use a lot more control about how it decides on thumbnail size, etc and the ability to use BBcode would be good. I would much rather it were a Firefox plugin than a complete browser replacement, but I see some mileage in it, for when I can't be arsed.