AMD's Phenom II pushed to 6.5GHz, 3DMark record demolished

If you touch your software enough does it become hardware?

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
News Reader
Salmon Ninja Pirate Gayer
Salmon Ninja Pirate Gayer
Posts: 1215
Joined: December 13th, 2006, 14:27

AMD's Phenom II pushed to 6.5GHz, 3DMark record demolished

Post by News Reader »

Image AMD's Phenom II pushed to 6.5GHz, 3DMark record demolished
Image

Ha, and you thought a 3DMark06 score of 5,086 was intense when AMD's Phenom II was overclocked to a blistering 3.85GHz. Just after CES, a team of hardcore speed freaks with access to liquid nitrogen and liquid helium created an environment for OC'ing one of AMD's latest Phenom II X4 chips in -232 degrees Celsius weather. Once the silicon was appropriately chilled, they proceeded to push the clock speed to a staggering 6.5GHz, which proved nimble enough to deliver a patently absurd 45,474 3DMark05 score. The best part? The adoring public was there to bear witness, and every nail-biting second of it is hosted up in the video just past the break.

[Via Digg]

Continue reading AMD's Phenom II pushed to 6.5GHz, 3DMark record demolished

Filed under: Gaming

AMD's Phenom II pushed to 6.5GHz, 3DMark record demolished originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Author: Darren Murph
Category: 3dmarkAMDbenchmarkCPUoverclockoverclockedoverclockingphenomphenom IIPhenomIiprocessorvideo
Publish Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:10:00 EST
Read more...

Source: Engadget
Description: Engadget
Image
buzzmong
Weighted Storage Cube
Weighted Storage Cube
Posts: 7167
Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
Location: Middle England, nearish Cov

Post by buzzmong »

blimeh
FatherJack
Site Owner
Site Owner
Posts: 9597
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
Location: Coventry, UK
Contact:

Post by FatherJack »

Why didn't they use the same version?
HereComesPete
Throbbing Cupcake
Throbbing Cupcake
Posts: 10249
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
Location: The maleboge

Post by HereComesPete »

Excellent. I'll have three please.

How about we actually only let 'normal use' scores stand and have a seperate special leaderboard for the guys who do stuff like this.
FatherJack
Site Owner
Site Owner
Posts: 9597
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
Location: Coventry, UK
Contact:

Post by FatherJack »

It is cheating a bit too much - the previous best scores (which weren't that far behind) were done using relatively cheap dual cores and even some 1.8G core in a couple of the earlier funtastic liquid helium parties. I think there's an i7 score that beats it, though.
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

Not to mention, if there were separate lists, people would just lie and cheat to get on the standard machines list.

I really think extreme overclocking should be mostly ignored, take the Q6600, it's a great chip, but it has the bonus of running 3ghz+ easily, if you want it to, with air cooling.

none of this super extreme stuff, just doesn't work for me.
HereComesPete
Throbbing Cupcake
Throbbing Cupcake
Posts: 10249
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
Location: The maleboge

Post by HereComesPete »

:above: I do like speed, and I do like shiny. But the end result I want is silky smooth gaming. I really couldn't be arsed spending my time cooling chips and finding the most stable revisions just to get the biggest score from a 3d mark.
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

HereComesPete wrote::above: I do like speed, and I do like shiny. But the end result I want is silky smooth gaming. I really couldn't be arsed spending my time cooling chips and finding the most stable revisions just to get the biggest score from a 3d mark.
:above: I can get a lot of extra speed from this machine if I need it, but I like stability and low noise more than an extra ghz from my cpu.
Post Reply