Google Chrome.
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Google Chrome.
Looks interesting, new browser, open sauce, seems to have some good ideas, uses the same rendering engine as safari, so that might be bad.
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Badger
- Posts: 120
- Joined: August 24th, 2007, 11:21
- Location: Netherfield, Nottingham, UK
- Contact:
I'll certainly give it a go.
Opinion seems to be split between cautious optimism and fidgety tin-foil-hatism. It's open source though, so you can bet there'll be people scouring the code for any sign of dirty dealings.
Alternatively, sit back and wait for Firefox/your-browser-of-choice to implement some of those shiny new features. Shouldn't be too long.
Opinion seems to be split between cautious optimism and fidgety tin-foil-hatism. It's open source though, so you can bet there'll be people scouring the code for any sign of dirty dealings.
Alternatively, sit back and wait for Firefox/your-browser-of-choice to implement some of those shiny new features. Shouldn't be too long.
Well, the beta's out.
http://www.google.com/chrome/
First impressions:
- First problem is that it doesn't maximize properly for me. I usually browse on the smaller of my two screens, but it maximizes to the resolution of my larger screen. Whoops.
- No autoscroll (middle-click)
- It's very simple and clean, but that also means it's not very configurable.
It's quite quick though.
edit: Oh, and it installs GoogleUpdater, which runs at startup. (disable it with msconfig)
http://www.google.com/chrome/
First impressions:
- First problem is that it doesn't maximize properly for me. I usually browse on the smaller of my two screens, but it maximizes to the resolution of my larger screen. Whoops.
- No autoscroll (middle-click)
- It's very simple and clean, but that also means it's not very configurable.
It's quite quick though.
edit: Oh, and it installs GoogleUpdater, which runs at startup. (disable it with msconfig)
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
Linky? I can't find anything in the usual places. Not massively surprising though. Firefox 3 had a good few hours after release.Fear wrote:Apparently it has a flaw that allows execution of code with 2 mouse clicks on a naughty page. It also has a flaw that can silently download a file to your desktop. Combine the 2 and you've got epic fail.
edit: Ah, I see, unfixed Webkit bugs. Tsktsk.
-
- Badger
- Posts: 120
- Joined: August 24th, 2007, 11:21
- Location: Netherfield, Nottingham, UK
- Contact:
Hmm, well, the google updater got caught by S&D's TeaTimer trying to write its registry entry and told to fuck off. Rather annoying though.
That said, I actually quite like the browser. It strikes me as something you'd bung on a media centre pc or something lightweight, but it's still quite nice and pages seem to load nice and quickly.
However, it isn't about to drag me away from the FF/Opera setup I currently have.
That said, I actually quite like the browser. It strikes me as something you'd bung on a media centre pc or something lightweight, but it's still quite nice and pages seem to load nice and quickly.
However, it isn't about to drag me away from the FF/Opera setup I currently have.