No Country for Old Men

For talk on Movies, TV, Music & Books

Moderator: Forum Moderators

spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

Dog Pants wrote:You are wrong.
I'm with Pete on this one. I really like Burton and Depp is pretty good but their Willy Wonka was a bit meh.
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

Well bomberesque, having seen the film, I think you are spot on. I haven't really got anything to add in the way of a review in fact! More reviews like this please!
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

/tangent
spoodie wrote:I'm with Pete on this one. I really like Burton and Depp is pretty good but their Willy Wonka was a bit meh.
The Gene Wilder version always seemed really camp, and apparently Dahl hated it because it wasn't dark enough. The Burton version was closer to the book and I preferred the Burtonesque sets and theme. I also loved Depp's Wonka - he seems to have been based a lot on Michael Jackson, which amuses me even now, and the way he seems so disinterested in the kids is brilliant. Gene Wilder always seemed mischievous but canny, whereas Depp seems slighly baffled and just hanging on to his sanity.
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

I've not seen the older version for many a year and therefore can't compare the two, but I loved the Burton version. I'm the first to admit that I'm a bit of a Burton fanboy, but I think that his style for this kind of film is perfect, since he does the silly comedy bits to it while retaining the darker elements too. I think that Depp's portrayal of a Wonka who is lost in his own world and oblivious to much outside of it is great, and seems more fitting than a more calculating or sane character.
bomberesque
Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 26th, 2004, 22:23
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by bomberesque »

Dog Pants wrote:I also loved Depp's Wonka

Body of a 40 year old, mind of a 12 year old

pfft.
amblin
Zombie Spanger
Zombie Spanger
Posts: 2663
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 11:50

Post by amblin »

.
Last edited by amblin on May 5th, 2014, 19:24, edited 1 time in total.
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

Just watched this (god bless ye oscar season) again, awesome (and totally correct) review there mr. bomber.


Oh, and I'm with the people who are right on this, the burton/depp Charlie and the chocolate factor was far superior to the gene wilder one, but I like both.
MORDETH LESTOK
Ninja Pirate
Ninja Pirate
Posts: 1651
Joined: April 10th, 2006, 3:34
Location: Detroitish

Post by MORDETH LESTOK »

hmm....just watched this and :?

my sweep audio was a bit off and it was hard to hear and understand what they were saying...sorta like hearing you brits on TS :P

gotta watch it again to figure it out...cuz not quite sure why it ended...
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

The ending is a bit odd, certainly not a traditional Hollywood ending. It's harder to put across on film (as opposed to the book) but the most important character is the sheriff (Tommy Lee Jones); take note of what he's saying and it'll make more sense.
MORDETH LESTOK
Ninja Pirate
Ninja Pirate
Posts: 1651
Joined: April 10th, 2006, 3:34
Location: Detroitish

Post by MORDETH LESTOK »

spoodie wrote:the most important character is the sheriff (Tommy Lee Jones); take note of what he's saying and it'll make more sense.
I kinda figured that as he was the one I couldn't quite understand... :ahoy:
Post Reply