The Illusionist

For talk on Movies, TV, Music & Books

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
bomberesque
Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 26th, 2004, 22:23
Location: Belgium
Contact:

The Illusionist

Post by bomberesque »

The illusionist

I saw this last night on DvD.

Set in Germany or Austria, can't be arsed to look it up, let's call it Ausmany, it's about a carpenter's son (Aaron Johnson) and amateur magician who falls for a local barroness or somesuch (Elanour Thomlinson) and impresses her by pulling balls magically out of her whotsit, or something.

He's judged (and rightly so) to be not nearly good enough for such high class crumpet by the local fuzz and leaves town at the beginning of the film. End of prologue.

Now the film starts....

Returning as an adult, our male lead is now Ed Norton and our bit of stuff has grown up into that lovely Scarlet Johanssen lookalike Jessica Beil. Jess is, by now, shacked up with Rufus Sewell (who?) playing teh crown prince of Ausmany, who does a good impression of being a Jude Law stand in and general all round arrogant royal twat type.

Illusion based shennanigans ensue

OK. I've failed to mention the most important person in this film, but I'll come to him in a minute, however I need to set something straight first.

Jessica Beil is a bit of alright and her "young version" is aswell. Most importantly, one is believably the younger version of the other. Noe the young version is currently in production of a movie titled "Angus, Thongs and Full-Frontal Snogging" which I shall be pre-ordering on DvD, but only for the thongs.

Ed and Aaron, OTOH are a different kettle of fish entirely. If one was, in fact, a fish the other would be a dog or a horse or something else with LEGS BUT NOT FINS. They look about as alike as when those characters used to leave neighbours to "go to uni" and returned 6 months later looking so different that the only thing they had in common with their previous selves was that they were the same sex (probably) which always left me wondering why all the other residents of the lane didn't stand up and scream "STRANGER" as soon as the resident shape-shifter walked in the room

I digress....

The prize in this movie is not, in fact, Ed Norton. As great an actor as his Edness is, you're really not getting value for nortonage out of this one. Further, the chance at good full-on frontal Jessica Beilage was sadly wasted (although I did manage to crack one out anyway). No, the prize in this film is Paul Giamatti. This dude is god, a humiliatingly unglamorous, possibly even ugly man (at least by Hollywood perfection standards) Paul Giamatti is one of my favorite actors on screen today. we really don't see enough of this guy. For a real view on what he's capable of, watch American Splendour (probably spelt differently by our Western cousins). He is superb in this film as the police chief, beholden to the Crown prince but from background similar to our hero's and so somewhat sympathetic to his plight.

****small spoiler****
For me, the thrust of this movie is that it is a love story and mystery told through the eyes of the Police chief charged with following our Jess about the place (for her "security") and later investigating Ed Norton when a connection between the two becomes apparant.
****end of small spoiler****

Thus, the "main characters", Ed and Jess, are infact secondary to the story teller ... or they should be. I would have preferred to see much more focus on the deliberations of the police chief (Paul Giamatti). The movie splits personalities between telling the story from Ed's perspective and from Paul's. This gets confusing, as the crux of the issue is the use of illusion and more to the point, the suspicion that it is more than illusion, in the prosecution of the plot so we can't be given too close a view on Ed's machinations or we'd work out what was going on. The difficulty, I suspect, is that Ed is just too big a star to "ignore" in favor of Paul Giamatti. My solution is simple. Don't fucking cast Ed Norton in a role you really don't want a very strong actor in. :faint: The movie poster tlls all. Ed is front and centre, Paul Giamatti is back left.

Slight schitzophrenia aside, the movie does manage to suspend disbelief and plays with the audiences (and the characters') willingness to believe in magic rather well. Paul Giamatti deserves more respect though.

for more illusion based shennanigans and a superb turn by another 2 faves of mine, Christian Bale and Micheal Caine, try The Prestige
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

You should write reviews for a living, that was a better read than the movie sounded.

Also, do a Google image search for Paul Giamatti and check out the second picture. I think we have a contender for the role of Gordon Freeman if a Half-Life movie is ever made.
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

Dog Pants wrote:You should write reviews for a living, that was a better read than the movie sounded.
Pffft, :above: this. I saw the poster, and having just saw The Prestige I thought "Pah, looks rubbish". That was based purely on the fact that there might be some small element of overlap in terms of majiks, and the Prestige clearly rules, although Ed Norton is generally a thumbs up for a film.
amblin
Zombie Spanger
Zombie Spanger
Posts: 2663
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 11:50

Re: The Illusionist

Post by amblin »

.
Last edited by amblin on May 6th, 2014, 10:04, edited 1 time in total.
bomberesque
Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 26th, 2004, 22:23
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by bomberesque »

:x :x

bugger, just lost my post. In summary

- ta for teh praise. Actually although I am not being paid to write reviews, I am being paid while writing them, which is almost as fun
- Prestige>illusionist but wouldn't buy either frankly
- PG as Gordon freeman = whin (and he'd probably do it, he seems to value being in work > "worthy"* material, he was in Big Momma's house and Paycheck...)

*not that half life is bad material but they'll hash it up, you know they will
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

The Prestige is one of my favourite films of the last year or so, along with The Departed. I think both are excellent, even though Christian Bale makes me think of Frank Lampard in the Prestige.
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

Top notch review sir!

I'm tempted to give this a look now - I'd basically written off after reading the initial reviews from when it came out.

The Prestige is a film of much aceness in my opinion. It's also one of those films that you appreciate so much more when you watch it a second time round and pick up on all the nuances of the plot and the acting.
HereComesPete
Throbbing Cupcake
Throbbing Cupcake
Posts: 10249
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
Location: The maleboge

Post by HereComesPete »

:above: This. I've not watched 'teh illusionist' so I too will jump on the bandwagon of 'hmm, good you say? Might as well!'.
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

Paul Giamati is awesome.
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

deject wrote:Paul Giamati is awesome.
:above:

I couldn't have taken Lady in the Water seriously if it wasn't for him. He brings a lot to the table/film.
Mr. Johnson
Mr Flibbles
Mr Flibbles
Posts: 4957
Joined: August 10th, 2006, 10:58
Location: belgium

Post by Mr. Johnson »

spoodie wrote:Lady in the Water
:shudder:
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

spoodie wrote:Lady in the Water
:shudder:


Fuck you M. Night Shamalamadingdong!
HereComesPete
Throbbing Cupcake
Throbbing Cupcake
Posts: 10249
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
Location: The maleboge

Post by HereComesPete »

:above: QFT, really fucking hard.
bomberesque
Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 26th, 2004, 22:23
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by bomberesque »

I would summarize the movie as worth a couple of hours of your time, if only for the opportunity to see Paul Giamatti in what verges on a proper role. Could have been soooo much better if they had given his role that much more respect though.

At the end of the day; poor bloke falls for rich bint .... society objects has been done before, so you're not getting anything original plotwise. The illusionist stuff isn't as geekworthy interesting as the Prestige because the main mystery revolves around "is this illusion or something more?"
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

Mr. Johnson wrote: :shudder:
Well I thought it was okay. It's was obviously nonsense but at least it's not the same old generic shit that Hollywood pumps out.
Woo Elephant Yeah
Heavy
Heavy
Posts: 5433
Joined: October 10th, 2004, 17:36
Location: Bristol, UK
Contact:

Post by Woo Elephant Yeah »

This is quite possibly the worst movie I have seen in recent years, it goes nowhere for about 90 mins, then builds up the the end, which both me and the missus guessed straight away due to the title of the film.

Utter piece of poo, even if the style and cinematography in places was rather good. Just don't bother
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

Gah! Damn these conflicting reports!
bomberesque
Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 26th, 2004, 22:23
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by bomberesque »

Woo Elephant Yeah wrote:This is quite possibly the worst movie I have seen in recent years
You don't watch enough Segal :wave:
Post Reply