Thanks Berk

Woo Elephant Yeah

Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:30)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:30)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:30)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:30)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:30)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs attacks you for 3 damage. You die. (2007-09-10 10:31)
Stapleballs says “no exorcisms, twat.”

Allowing spirits to wail and hp healing is just blatant XP building and I think it ruins the game. It's not like you haven't ever gone "against the system" within game in Shartak.
I feel I'm right in my actions in exorcising spirits, especially when I chose a Shaman for the purely simplistic point of playing as shaman character exorcising spirits.

Anyway, meh, whatever... I'll go back to being a "twat"

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 12:12

Woo Elephant Yeah wrote:whine whine whine.

Yeah, That hut is strongly Pro-Haunting, It's not like it's unlikely that natives will have a better relationship with spirits or anything, is it?

Please respect the beliefs and ideals of whatever town you're in in shartak.

Woo Elephant Yeah

And I suppose someone from your own community killing you and calling you a T-W-A-T is nothing to moan about.

Please don't try and start an argument, I'm not interested in having one.

Oh yeah..... and try not to be such a cupcake at times, even if it is your namesake.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 12:20

Fuck you.

That is all.

spoodie · Post by **spoodie** » September 10th, 2007, 13:46

Play nice or you'll get detention!

Fear · Post by **Fear** » September 10th, 2007, 14:11

Code: Select all

You attack Dr. Kb for 3 damage. They die.

/asking for it.

(I wish to play with my new haunting skills)

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 14:12

that wasn't very nice.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 14:17

Hint: Killing someone with 12ap left is not the correct way to get killed - that's how you get possessed

Post by **Grimmie** » September 10th, 2007, 14:50

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Fuck you.

That is all.

Be nice.

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v241/ ... a-cupcake.jpg">

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 14:58

Grimmie wrote: Be nice.

What? I in character, as Stapleballs killed wey's char (um mongo) in shartak, for something his character did (stapleballs often haunts there as it's reasonably friendly to ghosts, apart from when retarded shamen break the rules)

There was absolutely no need for him to use that OOC as a basis for personal attacks against me.

However, as he chose to attack me in such a manner, OOC I'm well within my rights to tell him to fuck off.

Post by **Grimmie** » September 10th, 2007, 15:09

When you put it that way..
In future, put it that way before telling people to fuck off, maybe :p?

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 15:11

Grimmie wrote:When you put it that way..
In future, put it that way before telling people to fuck off, maybe :p?

I was shocked and hurt at wey's actions and didn't feel I was capable of expressing myself in a reasonable and legible manner. So I didn't.

Post by **Roman Totale** » September 10th, 2007, 15:13

Since when has 5punk ever bothered about IC and OOC?

As for haunting being "allowed", there is rather a strong feeling against it on the official forums.

To quote one person:

Who in Wiksik decided this? XP farmers who cannot be bothered to get up off their backsides and do something useful?

Shamen exorcise spirits. If the ghosts don't like it that's tough. They should get a life

Post by **tandino** » September 10th, 2007, 15:14

I think we've all grown emotionally and sexually since the start of this thread. Group hug.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 15:17

Roman Totale wrote:Since when has 5punk ever bothered about IC and OOC?

Given I play 8 separate characters, I kinda find it beneficial to do the IC/OOC/Separate goals thing.

As far as haunting being allowed or not, If a shaman exorcises a spirit in the wiksik medhut, stapleballs will kill them (especially if they've exorcised me in the past)

But personally, I don't do the healing XP whoring, I just collect herbs to buy poison darts to kill the grey menace.

mrbobbins · Post by **mrbobbins** » September 10th, 2007, 15:33

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Something

Oh FFS, go out and be angry about something that's actually important instead of telling 5punkers to fuck off for not conforming to your idea of behaviour in browser based game

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 15:39

I'm not angry. I'm disappointed.

Seriously, the problem I have here is that wey decided to get pissed off at me as a person, for killing him in a computer game, IC/OOC/whatever aside.

What would happen if someone were to do the same as wey did every time they got killed in, say, beef, CS:S or CoD?

Post by **fabyak** » September 10th, 2007, 15:46

*sung to the tune of Indiana Jones*

INTERNET FIIIIIIIGHTS,
INTERWEBBBBBBBS,
INTERNET FIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHTS,
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

hmmmm, that was going to be epic when I started out... ah well LOLZ

Post by **Grimmie** » September 10th, 2007, 16:46

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:What would happen if someone were to do the same as wey did every time they got killed in, say, beef, CS:S or CoD?

I thought they did that with voip in CS 1.6?

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 10th, 2007, 16:51

sv_alltalk 0

Thanks Berk

Thanks Berk

Re: Thanks Berk