Page 1 of 2

Microsoft Served With Xbox 360 Lawsuit

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 7:01
by News Reader
Image Microsoft Served With Xbox 360 Lawsuit
Some guy in Florida is seeking $5 million in damages from Microsoft because his Xbox 360 scratched two games. While everyone knows that tipping your 360 from upright into the horizontal position will cause this, the guy claims that the he did not tip his and the 360 is simply "negligently designed and manufactured."

Brouwer said his Xbox 360 scratched two games, "Gears of War" and "Madden NFL 07," and that Microsoft offered to replace them for a $20 fee. He is seeking more than $5 million in damages, according to the court filing.

Comments


Publish Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:07:00 CDT
Read more...

Source: [H]ardOCP News/Article Feed
Description: News/Article Feed for [H]ardOCP

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 7:26
by Lateralus
$5million in damages. If it had fired both discs out of the console and gouged out his eyes, I might be sympathetic, but scratching two games? :? It's just fucked up. I hate the culture that makes people think they can shirk any responsibility for their actions and sue someone for their own fucktard behaviour. Especially for something so bloody meaningless as this.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 8:02
by eion
Well, I'm assuming this is a class action lawsuit.
You can file a lawsuit against anyone for any reason you like, but that does not mean you stand any chance of surviving a motion for summary judgment.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 8:09
by Lateralus
So in English, that means he will probably get laughed out of the initial hearing that decides whether or not the case has any merit?

Still, the fact that it is even being attempted is what I find deplorable.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 8:16
by eion
Lateralus wrote:So in English, that means he will probably get laughed out of the initial hearing that decides whether or not the case has any merit?
Well, Microsoft have to ask ("move") for that hearing, but yes.

There's another complication for class action cases, because the guy needs to get something called "class certification". Basically a judge has to sign off on various aspects of the case when someone wants to litigate on behalf of a large group of potential plaintiffs (although there's a little more to it than that ;)).
Lateralus wrote:Still, the fact that it is even being attempted is what I find deplorable.
Yeah, but unfortunately you'll always get fuckwits.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:04
by FatherJack
Is there not some penalty for being such an utter waste of time?

I can understand that he might want more than $20, unless you can actually buy two new games for that over in cheapskateland, but $5m damages were quite clearly not caused.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:06
by Lateralus
I think gouge out his eyes as punishment.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:07
by Dr. kitteny berk
Lateralus wrote:I think gouge out his eyes as punishment.
Spork or Grapefruit spoon?

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:09
by fabyak
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:<s>Spork or G</s>rape<s>fruit spoon</s>?

FIX'D

or a Spork coated in grapefruit juice

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:14
by eion
FatherJack wrote:I can understand that he might want more than $20, unless you can actually buy two new games for that over in cheapskateland, but $5m damages were quite clearly not caused.
That's why I assume it's a class action lawsuit, like I said up there. :above:

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:16
by Lateralus
Use an Xbox controller, and just pound his eyes until they fall out.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:27
by FatherJack
eion wrote:some legal words

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:36
by eion
Basically he's probably trying to sue on behalf of everyone in the US whose xbox 360 scratched their game discs.
See the Wikipedia article, or just check this out.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:44
by FatherJack
eion wrote:Basically he's probably trying to sue on behalf of everyone in the US whose xbox 360 scratched their game discs.
See the Wikipedia article, or just check this out.
That's why I didn't look it up, that just breaks my logic, however the second link explains perfectly.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 9:53
by eion
FatherJack wrote: That's why I didn't look it up, that just breaks my logic, however the second link explains perfectly.
Well, the rationale behind them is to solve collective action problems when someone does a little bit of harm to a large number of people... individually the chances of a person suing for something trivial are minimal, not least because attorney's fees alone would be more than they'd recover, but by suing on behalf of other people the whole thing becomes much more worthwhile. Named plaintiffs in the class get a larger recovery than class members who aren't personally involved in the litigation, which gives an incentive to try this kind of thing.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 10:28
by buzzmong
But er...$20 a disc......$5 million.


That's ALOT of people who need to sign up.


Mathematics timez:

5,000,000 / 20 = 250,000 individual disc claims.


:lol:

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 10:39
by eion
buzzmong wrote:But er...$20 a disc......$5 million.


That's ALOT of people who need to sign up.


Mathematics timez:

5,000,000 / 20 = 250,000 individual disc claims.


:lol:
For a class action, you don't sign up - you have to opt out to not be a part of the suit (and thus bound by the outcome). That's why a judge has to sign off on class certification.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 11:09
by Stoat
So wait- who gets the money if Mister Soft loses?

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 11:26
by eion
Stoat wrote:So wait- who gets the money if Mister Soft loses?
The lawyers for the class typically get a cut of about 35%, the named plaintiffs get a small but significant amount (in the five to six figure range I'm guessing), and the remainder gets split between class members that they can identify (which is where class certification comes in), often in the form of a cheque for a very small amount of money.

Posted: July 11th, 2007, 11:57
by Lateralus
All for being too damn thick to realise that a console not designed to be put on its side may not work the way intended if it is put on its side. :faint: