Page 1 of 1
Law and Order: Double or Nothing (Pulled from sale)
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 8:07
by Woo Elephant Yeah
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... 768695.stm
Can't say I disagree here, really really poor taste, and there was no need to do this, and I'm starting to wonder if this sort of thing is done on purpose to create a media frenzy
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 8:28
by bomberesque
yeah, that is pretty sick. As the article states though, the game has been out for 5 years so damage very much done, really.
My guess is some clever snot game designer thought it would be funny so slipped it in. The twat.
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 8:39
by eion
More likely the game was made by a US-based developer who didn't know the fuss it would cause, I suspect. Either way, seems fair to pull it from sale... assuming anyone's actually still buying it.
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 8:49
by bomberesque
eion wrote:More likely the game was made by a US-based developer who didn't know the fuss it would cause, I suspect.
I find that hard to accept. The image is innocuous in itself (it's just a cctv still from a shopping
mall centre) and something similar could have been procured just about anywhere. Whoever put this in knew what they were doing and with what. They may have not seen the problem, but that would be caused by some sort of autism rather than nationality, I would argue.
meh, makes no difference, as you said; who would be buying a 5 year old game that noone ever heard of anyway...
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 8:57
by buzzmong
eion wrote:More likely the game was made by a US-based developer who didn't know the fuss it would cause, I suspect. Either way, seems fair to pull it from sale... assuming anyone's actually still buying it.
According to their website they're based in Hollywood, probably just googled for a CCTV image to use from the UK.
Still bad taste though, but forgivable if it was done in error.
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 9:03
by eion
bomberesque wrote:I find that hard to accept. The image is innocuous in itself (it's just a cctv still from a shopping mall centre) and something similar could have been procured just about anywhere. Whoever put this in knew what they were doing and with what. They may have not seen the problem, but that would be caused by some sort of autism rather than nationality, I would argue.
Remember, Americans tend not to have much of a clue about anything that happens outside of America, especially old murder cases that really didn't get any press exposure outside of the UK... so I wouldn't be so quick to ascribe bad motives to whoever did this.
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 9:09
by bomberesque
yeah, I accept that, it just seems too much of a cioncidence that this particular image would turn up. As I said, the image itself is innocuous enough, it's the context that is so emotive and so you'd have to know that, or be very lucky to end up with that particular image.
/struggles to look for a better word than lucky.
Whatever really. Could be either.
On the other hand, it's been 5 years and no-one noticed until now so nothing doing, frankly.
What good games are due out that I should be covering with my credit card? (I am lazy and IT nazis have firewalled all the gaming sites, just waiting for them to cut 5punk off, actually)
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 9:53
by FatherJack
The image wasn't exactly prominent in the game, and while games are a form of entertainment, it's hardly fair to say the image was "used for entertainment".
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 10:15
by Roman Totale
I've heard that a Maddy game had been planned. They were going to call it 'Manic Minor'...
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 11:11
by buzzmong
Roman Totale wrote:I've heard that a Maddy game had been planned. They were going to call it 'Manic Minor'...
That's just reminded me of the CSS Maddy name-fest of wrongness a few weeks ago.
WHICH WAS WRONG. But amusing.
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 11:33
by TezzRexx
That is mildly disgusting, why didn't they just use a normal CCTV image?
I've heard that a Maddy game had been planned. They were going to call it 'Manic Minor'...
I feel like I'm going to the hot place just for reading that...
and slightly LOLing...
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 11:41
by eion
TezzRexx wrote:That is mildly disgusting, why didn't they just use a normal CCTV image?
Because they almost certainly
didn't know what it was... not surprising, given that it was a murder almost a decade previously, in another country. The case wasn't really reported much outside the UK as far as I know, and Americans tend to be ill-informed about what happens overseas anyway.
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 12:23
by Mr. Johnson
eion wrote:
Because they almost certainly didn't know what it was... not surprising, given that it was a murder almost a decade previously, in another country. The case wasn't really reported much outside the UK as far as I know, and Americans tend to be ill-informed about what happens overseas anyway.
even in these days of the internets? surely the younger generations are better informed? also, we get most of your headlines in belgium as well, but there is only a small sea between us, offcourse. (and there aren't enough interesting things to report)
mind you, i like making fun of the merkins as much as the next man...
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 12:44
by eion
Mr. Johnson wrote:
even in these days of the internets? surely the younger generations are better informed? also, we get most of your headlines in belgium as well, but there is only a small sea between us, offcourse. (and there aren't enough interesting things to report).
Even in these days of the internets, yes.
/is an American too
Posted: June 20th, 2007, 12:44
by Dr. kitteny berk
I suspect this was most likely an accidental happening.
To anyone who doesn't know the footage etc. it looks totally innocent.
Also, it's fairly high up the google image search for "shopping centre cctv" so it seems quite likely that they just found a random shot and used it.
but then, who knows?