Computer Monitor vs TVs

If you touch your software enough does it become hardware?

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Computer Monitor vs TVs

Post by Lateralus »

Something I've often wondered is why modern mahoosive HDTVs run at the same or similar screen resolutions as computer monitors? What is it that makes them better? I mean I'm on a 19" Dell monitor at work running at 1600x1200, so why is a TV at 1920x1080 an order of magnitude more expensive? I'm sure google has the answer, but firstly I wanted a comprehensible answer and secondly I'm too damn tired to trawl the intarweb today.
eion
Grammar Nazi
Grammar Nazi
Posts: 1511
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 22:23
Location: Beijing
Contact:

Re: Computer Monitor vs TVs

Post by eion »

Lateralus wrote:Something I've often wondered is why modern mahoosive HDTVs run at the same or similar screen resolutions as computer monitors? What is it that makes them better? I mean I'm on a 19" Dell monitor at work running at 1600x1200, so why is a TV at 1920x1080 an order of magnitude more expensive? I'm sure google has the answer, but firstly I wanted a comprehensible answer and secondly I'm too damn tired to trawl the intarweb today.
/resists fixing your adverbs

More inputs; better scalers; and, probably the most important factor, size. 1080p TVs tend to be a little larger than 19".
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

I'm far too tired today to care - I've left my Grammar Nazi hat at home. ;) I know HDTVs are double the size, which is why the fact that they have similar resolutions to monitors has bemused me somewhat.
eion
Grammar Nazi
Grammar Nazi
Posts: 1511
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 22:23
Location: Beijing
Contact:

Post by eion »

Lateralus wrote:I'm far too tired today to care - I've left my Grammar Nazi hat at home. ;) I know HDTVs are double the size, which is why the fact that they have similar resolutions to monitors has bemused me somewhat.
I have mine sewn to my scalp for convenience.

Actually if you think about it, HDTVs are a lot more than double the size - a 38" TV is actually four times the size of a 19" monitor. The reason that resolutions are similar is because they don't need to be bigger than that. Remember that you (hopefully!) sit a lot closer to your monitor than your TV, and that even 1080p TV content is still very rare.

To give an example, my old "TV" (actually a projector) had an image that was just over 10.5', at XGA (1024x768) resolution. It wasn't that great for web surfing, word processing, et cetera, but for watching television and movies on it was aces, and the relatively low resolution wasn't noticeable in any way when used for that. It was pretty decent for games, too.
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

Since the corner-to-corner distance is always used to measure screen size, I thought I'd carry on in the same manner. I'm sufficiently awake to know that double the "size" (19"-38") equates to four times the area. :P

One day I intend to have a house with enough rooms to allow me a cinema room, with a decent projector and surround sound. Wouldn't work in my current place, even if I could afford a projector!
eion
Grammar Nazi
Grammar Nazi
Posts: 1511
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 22:23
Location: Beijing
Contact:

Post by eion »

Lateralus wrote:Since the corner-to-corner distance is always used to measure screen size, I thought I'd carry on in the same manner. I'm sufficiently awake to know that double the "size" (19"-38") equates to four times the area. :P
Be that as it may, the screen/panel/whatever - which I'm guessing makes up the bulk of the cost in most HDTV/monitor setup (with the exception of front or rear projection) is a lot bigger in a TV as compared to a monitor (typically).
Lateralus wrote:One day I intend to have a house with enough rooms to allow me a cinema room, with a decent projector and surround sound. Wouldn't work in my current place, even if I could afford a projector!
Projectors aren't that expensive, if you shop around. I got mine in early 2004, and it cost me the princely sum of about £400 (for an InFocus LP350 in case you care). Bulbs can get pricy, but I hear that newer projectors are a lot less bulb-hungry, as was mine after I got a PSU and firmware upgrade (all for free! InFocus customer service rocks)

My old apartment wasn't particularly large, but I was lucky to have a space that worked well for a projector - a long room with a large, empty white wall at one end. Some of the newer projectors on the market apparently have relatively wide-angle lenses for a shorter throw distance, which is very helpful if you don't have an enormous area to work with.
Gunslinger42
Ninja
Ninja
Posts: 1448
Joined: February 12th, 2005, 17:53

Post by Gunslinger42 »

Just set up a spare room with virtual reality magics. Have one wall dedicated to gaming, one for interweb surfing, one for movies and one for porn.
ProfHawking
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2101
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 21:31

Post by ProfHawking »

Gunslinger42 wrote:Just set up a spare room with virtual reality magics. Have one wall dedicated to gaming, one for interweb surfing, one for movies and one for porn.
I like this idea. Hmm. I need a square room though....
Lateralus
Dr Zoidberg
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 4217
Joined: May 15th, 2005, 15:20

Post by Lateralus »

Gunslinger42 wrote:Just set up a spare room with virtual reality magics. Have one wall dedicated to gaming, one for interweb surfing, one for movies and one for porn.
Genius idea! :lol:

When my mates were looking for a house in second year of Uni, they claimed they saw a house where someone had set up a "mastabatorium" which consisted of a room with a single chair and some kleenex in it, with porn all over the walls. I suspect mild embellishment of the story, but 'tis amusing anyway.
Post Reply