Page 1 of 2

Activision to cancel Ghostbusters? [News]

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 11:00
by News Reader
Image Activision to cancel Ghostbusters? [News]
Activision has released a new product schedule, with no mention of Ghostbusters or Brutal Legend, both of which may be lost in the merger.

Category: News
Publish Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:09:22 +0100
Read more...

Source: bit-tech.net feed
Description: Computer hardware, games and technology reviews and news
Image

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 11:46
by buzzmong
I reckon bullshit on this, as it was due for release later this year iirc, and they've managed to put out a fairly polished E3 video, I suspect there can't be much more to do before it goes gold.

If they do cancel if after a couple of years of development, not to mention the fact they've got all that other talent on board, they're fucking idiots.

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 11:53
by Mr. Johnson
bit-tech wrote:Blood on the Sand, Chronicles of Riddick
I can perfectly understand why you'd want to cancel those, but brĂ¼tal legend and ghostbusters? A game with Bill Murray and a game that lets you explore old metal album covers? ridiculous!

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 12:15
by spoodie
haha, Blood on the Sand
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1J9TMwXvSA[/media]
What a load of ego massaging shit.

However Chronicles of Riddick is a guilty pleasure for me, I love that film and the first game was quite good.

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 12:58
by TezzRexx
Please god no :(

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 13:36
by Dog Pants

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 14:30
by Hehulk
Dog Pants wrote:
I see.

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 14:46
by Baliame
Dog Pants wrote:

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 16:03
by Dr. kitteny berk

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 16:17
by Dog Pants
Well, this is great. If the ionization-rate is constant for all ectoplasmic entities, we can really bust some heads... in a spiritual sense, of course.

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 16:24
by Dr. kitteny berk
Dog Pants wrote:Well, this is great. If the ionization-rate is constant for all ectoplasmic entities, we can really bust some heads... in a spiritual sense, of course.
:facepalm:

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 16:26
by Sheriff Fatman
You knew that quote from memory, didn't you, Doggers :P

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 17:13
by HereComesPete
spoodie wrote:haha, Blood on the Sand
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1J9TMwXvSA[/media]
What a load of ego massaging shit.

However Chronicles of Riddick is a guilty pleasure for me, I love that film and the first game was quite good.
They will make a film of this. :roll:

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 17:31
by Dog Pants
HereComesPete wrote:They will make a film of this. :roll:
And that will be shit too.

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 17:39
by Roman Totale
Please god tell me that Blood on the Sand is a piss take.


Please?

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 17:40
by HereComesPete
There is no god. Fiddy beat him up and stole his shotgun.

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 18:17
by deject
God don't know how to live on the streets like fiddy!

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 20:10
by TezzRexx
Dog Pants wrote:Well, this is great. If the ionization-rate is constant for all ectoplasmic entities, we can really bust some heads... in a spiritual sense, of course.
:thrust:

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 20:53
by deject

Posted: July 29th, 2008, 20:57
by Dr. kitteny berk