Page 1 of 1
Is More Memory Better?
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 9:17
by Dr. kitteny berk
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 10:35
by Killavodka
So if we want to use 4gb RAM+ 1gb VRAM* it requires a 64bit OS?
*well use all 5gb instead of the 4gb max
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 10:39
by Dr. kitteny berk
Killavodka wrote:So if we want to use 4gb RAM+ 1gb VRAM* it requires a 64bit OS?
*well use all 5gb instead of the 4gb max
pretty much.
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 11:28
by Lee
I was reading this earlier on. I'm starting to wonder whether I should go with Fista 64 on my next PC since I'll likely end up with 4gb of ram and 1gb of vram. I can get a copy for free through uni so I suppose it won't hurt to try...
Is Fista still slower than XP in frame rates and general usage these days?
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 11:33
by Dr. kitteny berk
Lee wrote:Is Fista still slower than XP in frame rates and general usage these days?
From what I've heard, they're about equal now, Half looking at Fista myself, just for a change really.
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 12:02
by buzzmong
I always subscribed to the school of balancing faster memory with amount.
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 12:08
by Dr. kitteny berk
buzzmong wrote:I always subscribed to the school of balancing faster memory with amount.
until recently
/using 4gb of 1066
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 12:22
by shot2bits
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:
From what I've heard, they're about equal now, Half looking at Fista myself, just for a change really.
that ^ fista on its current service pack hits pretty much the same on all benchmarks as XP sp3 i think it is
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 15:01
by deject
Yeah now that Service Pack 1 is out and they've fixed a lot of things, Fista64 isn't looking so bad anymore. That and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky are making it tempting to upgrade.
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 15:04
by Dr. kitteny berk
deject wrote:Yeah now that Service Pack 1 is out and they've fixed a lot of things, Fista64 isn't looking so bad anymore. That and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky are making it tempting to upgrade.
that and buy a 4870
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 23:32
by Killavodka
I was under the impression that a 64bit OS required a 64bit processor, or have they made it so they work on 32bit systems too?
Posted: July 8th, 2008, 23:34
by Dr. kitteny berk
Killavodka wrote:I was under the impression that a 64bit OS required a 64bit processor, or have they made it so they work on 32bit systems too?
you need a 64 bit processor.
If you
really want more than 4gb supported on a 32bit windows os, I
think 2k3 enterprise server R2 will support it. but allow a few hours for getting everything to work.
Posted: July 9th, 2008, 2:16
by deject
Killavodka wrote:I was under the impression that a 64bit OS required a 64bit processor, or have they made it so they work on 32bit systems too?
It does require a 64-bit CPU, and everything made after the Athlon 64 and Pentium D are 64-bit.