Page 1 of 1
Wanted
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 13:36
by MORDETH LESTOK
hmm...I tend not to do reviews since I tend to hate everything...but 5punk must be warned!
Pretty much...all you need to see is the trailer. By the time you're 1/2 way thru the movie...you already know what the remaining 1/2 will be.
Angelina is hot of course...but only naked for 5seconds. For some reason, I prefer to see/hear her talk than just look pretty...maybe cuz her lips are moving
Alas, she was only a supporting toon...it was all about the punk.
The worst part for me was that the punk was still a punk after he became super assassin. And the silly narrative werds...
oh...I forgot, the best part is the beginning 5mins...quite matrixy...then it went all to shit...
How to rate it...
/ 10 assassins (1 for Angelina)
I will never watch this movie again...
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 13:51
by Dog Pants
The trailer completely put me off this. I could maybe have put up with the bullet-bending thing (probably not though) if it was the premise of the film and nothing else daft happened, but as soon as I saw a slow motion shot of a bullet spinning past Jolie's head, and her hair moving with the breeze, I just hated it.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 13:53
by Dr. kitteny berk
I saw the trailer, then downloaded the movie, just so I could delete it.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 14:32
by spoodie
I've heard good things and intend to see it. I think you're probably all being too harsh.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 16:06
by MORDETH LESTOK
spoodie wrote:I've heard good things and intend to see it. I think you're probably all being too harsh.
I wish everyone would be more harsher and stop being satisfied with mediocrity! Just cuz it looks pretty, has a decent story and acting...does not make this movie GOOD...it might be better than alot of other crap...but still not good.
me·di·o·cre [mee-dee-oh-ker] –adjective
1. of only ordinary or moderate quality; neither good nor bad; barely adequate.
2. rather poor or inferior.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 16:49
by Dr. kitteny berk
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 17:50
by spoodie
Well not every film can be great, but studios could do with outputting less dross. Unfortunately people pay to see dross.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 18:00
by Dog Pants
I can live with bad films - that's bad in a good way, like most of the stuff Peter Jackson did before Lord of the Rings. It's hollywood blockbusters that take themselves seriously but are testicle-tuggingly bad and full of ridiculous leaps of faith and deus ex machina.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 19:34
by Roman Totale
Dog Pants wrote: full of ridiculous leaps of faith and deus ex machina.
And prophecies. Why the fuck does everything need to prophesised these days - why can't shit just happen?
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 19:48
by MORDETH LESTOK
damn google safesearch!
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 19:49
by Dr. kitteny berk
Roman Totale wrote:
And prophecies. Why the fuck does everything need to prophesised these days - why can't shit just happen?
Shit happens in accordance with the prophecy.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 20:37
by Dog Pants
MORDETH LESTOK wrote:
damn google safesearch!
Don't knock it. I googled manhole the other day and wished that I'd had safesearch on. Or that my eyes would explode in my skull.
Posted: July 7th, 2008, 21:07
by Akiakaiu
Dog Pants wrote:
Don't knock it. I googled manhole the other day and wished that I'd had safesearch on. Or that my eyes would explode in my skull.
Now you should have known better.