Page 1 of 2

Mass Effect (not) staying a Xbox 360 exclusive [News]

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 12:01
by News Reader
Image Mass Effect staying a Xbox 360 exclusive [News]
After EA bought up developer BioWare, Mass Effect was open to become multi-platform. Microsoft has other ideas though...

Author: Joe Martin
Read more...

Source: bit-tech.net feed
Description: bit-tech.net
Image

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 13:08
by spoodie
It looks PCspacks are going to miss-out on this one then. Shame because I really enjoyed it and would like to have played it again on the PC.

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 16:44
by Fear
isn't this the one where you get control a shag fest, or something?

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 17:28
by Baliame

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 18:01
by deject
FAIL Me want Mass Effect on PC. :(

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 18:11
by deject
After actually reading the article, the no Mass Effect on PC thing is more bit-tech assuming and reading into things than any real direct quotes. Plus, EA controls Bioware and Mass Effect, not Microsoft. I'm guessing they'll keep the same arrangement they've had so far, Xbox first, then after a while release it for PC.

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 18:43
by HereComesPete
:above: This. EA and Microsoft making a decision to lose money by not putting mass effect on the pc? I think not.


In the mean time, there's always the option to re-visit kotor 1 and 2. :likesitall:

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 19:06
by spoodie
Fear wrote:isn't this the one where you get control a shag fest, or something?
FYI this is entirely overhyped. There is some sexy stuff but it's not any worse than other games.

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 19:08
by HereComesPete
Mug of nice hot coffee anyone?

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 19:10
by spoodie
HereComesPete wrote:Mug of nice hot coffee anyone?
There's potential. The models are quite nice and have less angles than your average game.

Posted: February 12th, 2008, 22:02
by deject
even more proof it is coming to PC, BioWare has released some screenshots of the PC version:

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/51276

So basically the bit-tech article is just Microsoft FUD.

Posted: February 13th, 2008, 0:13
by spoodie
The 360 version looked very nice and these look even better. Higher res and they've actually altered menus to make better use of the PC screen, shame on you Oblivion (without mods of course). Should be good.

Posted: February 13th, 2008, 0:27
by MORDETH LESTOK
so...when will Xbox become a PC? Couldn't they put $200 more on the price tag and become PC powered? With the HD TV's now...you can actually read the text on the screen. I'd prefer sitting on the couch with a wireless KB/Trackball looking at 60" screen...
:ahoy:

Posted: February 13th, 2008, 5:18
by HereComesPete
Here's my view on this -

It pretty much is already. It has a tri-core IBM xenon cpu and an ATi gpu with 512 of ram, basically a 1950 XT with a few mods to make it a tad faster.

Although the 360 offers affordable high quality graphics and the next one (whatever it's name may be) will get even closer in terms of quality, the companies methods of manufacture are the same as any large scale enterprise, by the time they've selected a manufacturer and the chip is made, it's old news for pc gamers.

The ps3 can be had with a linux install on it, but it's then a crap console with a mediocre pc OS on it.

The pricing was one of the problems with the ps3, many people can't afford a high quality pc for the best games, so they get a console. They can play a good looking version of the same game on a console and it'll work.

The ps3's blurring of boundaries meant the price was higher, closer to mid/high range gaming pc's and this lead to consolers getting annoyed at the high price, and pc gamers ignoring it in favour of the high quality low priced parts they can get for their pc.


I think the pace of pc parts will always progress faster than consoles, until such time as we hit the wall of current technological understanding - we can only refine silicon so far. Until that point (which may never even occur) consoles and pc's will be separate entities and I think that's a good thing.

/early morning ramble.

Posted: February 13th, 2008, 5:53
by deject
Just a correction, the Xenos GPU is more 2900XT than 1950XT. It was the first "Unified Shader" GPU (i.e.: DirectX 10 class).

Also, Pete fails at facts.

Posted: February 13th, 2008, 8:20
by Baliame
I want to buy either a sexbox or a cockstation. Deciding factor is that multiplayer gaming on sexbox costs fifty bucks or so a month...

Posted: February 13th, 2008, 10:39
by FatherJack
Baliame wrote:I want to buy either a sexbox or a cockstation. Deciding factor is that multiplayer gaming on sexbox costs fifty bucks or so a month...
I was under the impression it was £35 for a year.

Posted: February 14th, 2008, 2:20
by HereComesPete
:above: This. I do believe you fiddy bux is a yearly thing, and therefore rather moar worth it thn you had previously thought.


Also deej - the gpu in a 360 isn't as good as a 2900, if that series of words can be used in a sentence. Hence why I put 1950xt but a tad faster, it isn't one nor t'other.

Either way, my not quite 2900 360 gpu is far superior to KV's most definitely 2900 pc gpu which is utterly fail. Doubly so when my 360 cost about the same as KV paid for his 2900. :lol:

Posted: February 14th, 2008, 6:05
by deject
HereComesPete wrote::above: This. I do believe you fiddy bux is a yearly thing, and therefore rather moar worth it thn you had previously thought.


Also deej - the gpu in a 360 isn't as good as a 2900, if that series of words can be used in a sentence. Hence why I put 1950xt but a tad faster, it isn't one nor t'other.

Either way, my not quite 2900 360 gpu is far superior to KV's most definitely 2900 pc gpu which is utterly fail. Doubly so when my 360 cost about the same as KV paid for his 2900. :lol:
Pete shut the fuck up it's by far closer to a 2900 than a 1950. You're wrong, accept it.

Posted: February 14th, 2008, 14:40
by centerededgedesign
I, too, will probably be micro budgeted into buying a console before I'll be able to buy a new laptop. Tis quite sad, but console gaming is more of a family pass-time than playing on the laptop. Also, cheaper, as was pointed out before. Are there any PS3 owners here that have the backward compatible system? My father-in-law has the non compatible one, that he justified buying as a Blu-ray player, not knowing the difference and wanting to save $100. I'm curious about the quality of older PS1 and PS2 titles on it, as I'm not about to let my old favorites go. If they don't play well on it, I'll buy a backup PS2 when they become scarce, and wait for the PS4 to shove the price on PS3's down. Price of used games is a great reason to stay one system behind the 'current' system. But waiting a year to play the new hot games (even with a huge price break) is a bit trying.

All in all though, I've not paid full price for a console game in 4 years. Which allows me to buy more of them, and I don't get bitten buy spending $40 on a game that ends up sucking!

edit: Also, tis looking more and moar like the Blu-ray is going to win the format war, so HD-DVD drives in the sexbox will be useless besides the games they play.