Page 1 of 2
WTF Magazine
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 17:50
by thewombleofdeath
I found out about this the other month and forgot to post it; basically its a completely free magazine that's published once every 2 months (free postage aswell) from the Ebuyer people that has just some info on latest techie stuff (eg. New PC bits, Photography technology stuff, gadgets etc.). Personally I think its pretty good, considering I'm not paying anything for it

It's all properly published on glossy magazine paper and around 100 pages in the 2 that i've recieved so far.
check it out
http://www.wtfmagazine.co.uk/
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 18:42
by Akiakaiu
Looks interesting, wonder if they will send them to the US.
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 19:11
by thewombleofdeath
doesn't look like it. there isn't a country box to fill in so I would think its just for the UK
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 19:12
by HereComesPete
Haven't ebuyer just started in the US? I'm not quite sure I read that somewhere.
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 19:14
by Dr. kitteny berk
HereComesPete wrote:Haven't ebuyer just started in the US? I'm not quite sure I read that somewhere.
AFAIK they opened in the US a long time ago, but folded other there too.
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 19:17
by HereComesPete
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:
AFAIK they opened in the US a long time ago, but folded other there too.

'other there'

Not like you to slip up on the grammerz berk. And also, too? Where else have they folded?
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 19:18
by Dr. kitteny berk
other = over.
too, meaning that they went on to fail over there.
Posted: November 17th, 2007, 19:21
by HereComesPete
Yes, but the 'too' still implies that they have failed in more than one place, the US being merely one of them. I guess you just want them to fail here as well!

Posted: November 18th, 2007, 0:12
by ProfHawking
Meh looks like it might be interesting for a freebe...
*Signs up office*
Posted: November 18th, 2007, 13:22
by MORDETH LESTOK
HereComesPete wrote:Yes, but the 'too' still implies that they have failed in more than one place, the US being merely one of them. I guess you just want them to fail here as well!

Berk said "too"...not "two"

Posted: November 18th, 2007, 13:25
by MORDETH LESTOK
bah...I thought it was going to be "What The F%@K!"
now, I'd buy that for a dollar!
BTW There is no future...people need to accept this...game over!
Posted: November 18th, 2007, 13:27
by eion
Honestly, I leave here for a little while, and when I get back everyone's spelling and grammar has gone to pot
and I no longer have my Grammar Nazi rank. What is the world coming to?

Posted: November 18th, 2007, 13:30
by MORDETH LESTOK
eion wrote:What is the world coming to?

to or too or two? we r confused...
Posted: November 18th, 2007, 13:34
by eion
MORDETH LESTOK wrote:
to or too or two? we r confused...
I was going to make that joke... but I chose not to.
Posted: November 18th, 2007, 23:58
by HereComesPete
eion wrote:Honestly, I leave here for a little while, and when I get back everyone's spelling and grammar has gone to pot
and I no longer have my Grammar Nazi rank. What is the world coming to?

Well pull your finger out and make (mostly) unnecessary adjustments to peoples grammar and prose, you might well have that 'punishment' rank back in no time!

Posted: November 19th, 2007, 22:46
by eion
HereComesPete wrote:
Well pull your finger out and make (mostly) unnecessary adjustments to people
's grammar and prose,
and you might well have that 'punishment' rank back in no time!

Fix'd.
I'd make more adjustments if the Internet and my computer here were even close to usable for more of the time. A 2Mb/2Mb connection (shared between three office buildings) and a 566MHz Celeron do not make for a pleasant browsing experience.
Posted: November 19th, 2007, 22:53
by HereComesPete
You put that 'and' in, but didn't remove the comma before it. Sloppy work Eion.
But with the set-up you currently suffer under, I'm surprised you even bother, unplug everyone else and enjoy the bandwidth.
Posted: November 19th, 2007, 22:57
by Dr. kitteny berk
HereComesPete wrote:You put that 'and' in, but didn't remove the comma before it. Sloppy work Eion.
That's fine actually.
Posted: November 19th, 2007, 23:00
by HereComesPete
Lies.
Posted: November 19th, 2007, 23:02
by Dr. kitteny berk