XP faster than Fista, with tests!
Posted: October 27th, 2007, 12:54
I in no way support/condone/denounce/reject or even yesno this article, but I did find it a fairly interesting read.
http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/601470/v ... lower.html
Edit for berk being a lazy, well, berk.
Fista is slower at encoding stuff, and they had to overclock their whole system 12.5% to get it to match the speeds set in xp. 2d apps run slower on fista, dvd rips are slower on fista, microsoft, being tarts, have given a bit of a shaft to openGL because its not directx API, 3d apps run slower because of the new drivers, hardware lighting rendering in cinebench was 250% slower on fista.
Games wise, xp is in front except for stalker, which runs like a dream on fista, everything else (oblivion, nfs:c, prey, fear) was slower overall or had graphics/sound problems most games run flaky, needing compatability modes. 3d mark was slower in fista. No eax in fista so you'd need basic sterio mode go unless you used creatives fettle.
Even shorter version - Fista still sucks, use XP.
http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/601470/v ... lower.html
Edit for berk being a lazy, well, berk.
Fista is slower at encoding stuff, and they had to overclock their whole system 12.5% to get it to match the speeds set in xp. 2d apps run slower on fista, dvd rips are slower on fista, microsoft, being tarts, have given a bit of a shaft to openGL because its not directx API, 3d apps run slower because of the new drivers, hardware lighting rendering in cinebench was 250% slower on fista.
Games wise, xp is in front except for stalker, which runs like a dream on fista, everything else (oblivion, nfs:c, prey, fear) was slower overall or had graphics/sound problems most games run flaky, needing compatability modes. 3d mark was slower in fista. No eax in fista so you'd need basic sterio mode go unless you used creatives fettle.
Even shorter version - Fista still sucks, use XP.