Page 1 of 2
Linux
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 11:43
by [JUST] Useless
:D I have just installed Suse Linux 9.1 and still managed to find my way back
Re: Linux
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 11:48
by Jinxx
[JUST] Useless wrote::D I have just installed Suse Linux 9.1 and still managed to find my way back
SuSE's not tough, but it does have a tendency to shout at you.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 12:54
by Nickface
When I had a Linux box I ran Slackware
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 13:12
by Jinxx
Nickface wrote:When I had a Linux box I ran Slackware
I was most fond of Gentoo, but I'll use Fedora for ease of setup and use.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 13:52
by cashy
GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!
*runs like fuck*
actualy ive always wanted to get linux on the go, its just the fact that there are alot of things its not compatable with, and i wouldnt have a clue what i was doing for a while. prolly more effort than its worth
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 15:22
by Stoat
I managed to install Fedora t'other day. Got it nicely dual-booting with XP too. I am most proud. Now I just need to figure out what I can use it for.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 15:30
by Dr. kitteny berk
Linux rocks for doing uh, stuff.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 16:10
by killslay
i'd love to run linux but a lot of games don't run on it and i'm sure that i couldn't use messenger and all the other stuff i waste my time with.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 16:14
by Dr. kitteny berk
mostly these days, the only thing linux is crap at is games (mainly due to crap drivers and no direct x support, most openGL games run fine)
otherwise, it's at least as capable as windows and there's shedloads of IM apps and suchlike
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 16:17
by killslay
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:mostly these days, the only thing linux is crap at is games (mainly due to crap drivers and no direct x support, most openGL games run fine)
otherwise, it's at least as capable as windows and there's shedloads of IM apps and suchlike
hmm in that case when i upgrade this git, i'll stick my older stuff into another case and make a linux rig
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 16:18
by Jinxx
linux makes for a kickass workhorse OS, there's an open source commandline tool for practically anything these days. If you're willing to put in the effort, learn a little *sh, read a few manpages and hammer it about a bit, you'll find a use for it.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 16:47
by killslay
i'm downloading a linux live CD distribution, just so i can say i have one
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 16:59
by deject
I would have installed Linux a while ago if it weren't for the gaming issue. I'd love to dump Windoze, but these days I use my computer mainly as a gaming machine, so loading Linux would just be wasting hard drive space.
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 17:41
by [JUST] Useless
Ah Ive got it to dual boot Linux or Win XP Pro, best of both worlds.
Now all I have to do is figure out how to use Linux properly
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 19:12
by wyrd
i dual boot ubuntu and xp
ubuntu's as easy as pi
(i tried to install gentoo, but got lost
)
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 19:33
by Lee
I've thought about switching to linux but games are the main thing stopping me. I found something called cedega which lets you run windows games under linux:
http://www.transgaming.com/ has anyone tried it? how well did games run compared to windows?
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 19:56
by Jinxx
Lee.H wrote:I've thought about switching to linux but games are the main thing stopping me. I found something called cedega which lets you run windows games under linux:
http://www.transgaming.com/ has anyone tried it? how well did games run compared to windows?
I tried it, but at the time most distributions were switching over to X.Org and ATI still only had drivers for the depreciated XFree86. I got Warcraft 3 running fine under it though.
But be warned, installing the graphics card drivers can be a ball ache:
1) they're not open source
2) they usually need configuring by hand
3) they are seperate from the distribution and may break stuff
4) they're not as immediately configurable
But also:
1) they're fucking fast (and I mean jaw droppingly so - Linux UT2004 will run a good 30-40 fps faster over Windows UT2004 on a Sempron 2600+ w/9600XT)
2) they're rock solid
3) they make you look uber geeky
Also, if you don't have a popular sound card (like a sound blaster, nforce audio etc) or your card chip is extremely modern, you may not find any support for it in the linux kernel - and soundcard manufacturers are very reluctant to support linux.[/u]
Posted: July 10th, 2005, 22:17
by [JUST] Useless
Wow looks like I jumped into the deep end then. Oh well nothing ventured nothing gained.
Posted: July 11th, 2005, 1:14
by Nickface
I tried to throw Fedora on my IBM Thinkpad 600e but the sound didn't work and I didn't have time to fuck about with it (I was using it to play music for my 4th of July bash) and so I just threw XP on it instead.
Posted: July 11th, 2005, 8:15
by Woo Elephant Yeah
For that uber geeky look, you have to understand Unix.
However this involves wearing jesus sandals with socks, and having a long beard to stroke whilst remembering stupidly long command lines.