Page 4 of 4
Posted: June 20th, 2006, 21:12
by cashy
made me cringe did that.
the first half was some of the best football ive seen from england this world cup, we were all over them. meh, could of been worse i guess
Posted: June 20th, 2006, 21:22
by pixie pie
FatherJack wrote:Anhamgrimmar wrote:unlucky for owen as well

That looked bad - I'd have taken a defeat and Germany over potentially losing him for the rest of the tournament.
I wouldn't. He's done next to nothing so far. He'd have to show a vast improvement on his current self to warrant that statement true.
Of course when he's on top form that would be very true, but he hasn't.
I was very shocked to see Erikson not bring on Walcott, and he has proved that if he can't play him in an eventually harmless game, then he won't play him at all (Unless we have a minor disaster with injuries).
Joe Cole played very well. More of that please.
Posted: June 21st, 2006, 7:37
by Woo Elephant Yeah
pixie pie wrote:That looked bad - I'd have taken a defeat and Germany over potentially losing him for the rest of the tournament.
I wouldn't. He's done next to nothing so far. He'd have to show a vast improvement on his current self to warrant that statement true.
Of course when he's on top form that would be very true, but he hasn't.
I was very shocked to see Erikson not bring on Walcott, and he has proved that if he can't play him in an eventually harmless game, then he won't play him at all (Unless we have a minor disaster with injuries).
Joe Cole played very well. More of that please.
All of this

with added "whoops my predictions were a bit wrong, but the England match wasn't far off at one point"
Posted: June 21st, 2006, 8:30
by mrbobbins
mrbobbins wrote:Went for the 20:1
Don't let me down WEY!


Posted: June 21st, 2006, 8:37
by amblin
.
Posted: June 21st, 2006, 8:38
by Woo Elephant Yeah
*donates 20 5perm to Bobbins*
Posted: June 21st, 2006, 13:48
by FatherJack
I didn't go for the 600/1 bet - although it was a bit misleading on the website, and they wouldn't have paid out on linked bets. The best I could find without linked bets was around 266/1, but again, they probably would have wormed out of it, plus they wanted to do over-the-phone verification, so I didn't bother in the end.
Posted: July 1st, 2006, 18:50
by mrbobbins