Posted: May 25th, 2006, 23:07
you want winamp? i got winamp. wet winamp, dry winamp, 2.81 winamp, 2.95 winamp, smelly winamp
http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=winamp
http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=winamp
FatherJack wrote:why would I want to view a thousand 001.mpg's before getting to the appropriate 002.mpg?
I'm afraid you only qualify for £2.50Dr. kitteny berk wrote:you are viewing the free samples from porn sites, aicmfpFatherJack wrote:why would I want to view a thousand 001.mpg's before getting to the appropriate 002.mpg?
DOUBLE TRUEDr. kitteny berk wrote:That!Stoat wrote:iTunes is shit.
The installer, which you have to use every time there's any kind of update, is shit. The playlist system is shit. The way it guesses which music to copy to an ipod and does so without asking is shit. It is a music store first and a music player second. That's shit.
Again: iTunes is shit.
THIRDEDdeject wrote:DOUBLE TRUEDr. kitteny berk wrote:That!Stoat wrote:iTunes is shit.
The installer, which you have to use every time there's any kind of update, is shit. The playlist system is shit. The way it guesses which music to copy to an ipod and does so without asking is shit. It is a music store first and a music player second. That's shit.
Again: iTunes is shit.
Blimey, this thread's grown since I last looked at it. Answering this without checking the rest of the thread so I don't forget: I've had a quick look to see if I can configure it differently and can't see any way (I'm talking about the Sony software here, but I get the same impression from iTunes and WMP), but to be honest when I have Winamp to do it how I want to I can't raise the enthusiasm to try very hard. I prefer my music arranged by genre because I can listen to one artist's album in the car on CD, so at home I prefer a mix of my favourite tunes. In fact, that goes for any MP3 media - the big restriction with Mrs Pants' Sony thing is that unlike my MP3 player you can't just copy the files to it like removable media, you're forced to use their interface. Combined with it scanning my hard drives for every audio file and putting them in one big list, categorised by artist, makes it very time consuming to find the ones she wants. It'd be far easier for me just to be able to navigate to the folder they're in because I've put all the tracks she wants in one place.pixie pie wrote:How much have you used iTunes? If you use the playlist system well; the smart playlists work very well. I can concur with the update system, but it hasn't been an issue with me, it keeps all your info, so apart from those extra 3 minutes, there is no big issue there. Overall, I feel it is nicer mainly for its simplicity. It has a nice search function (I remember WMP had a very hidden search function). And to question Dog Pants, Why not have it sorted by Artist? And you can configure it to sort otherwise; even by your own choice!Stoat wrote:iTunes is shit.
The installer, which you have to use every time there's any kind of update, is shit. The playlist system is shit. The way it guesses which music to copy to an ipod and does so without asking is shit. It is a music store first and a music player second. That's shit.
Again: iTunes is shit.
More or less my opinion Spoodie. But hey, who ever let nice clear facts get in the way of a good discussion abot how microsoft, apple, and various other products suckspoodie wrote:If you don't like something don't use it, whats the big deal?
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:THIRDEDdeject wrote:DOUBLE TRUEDr. kitteny berk wrote:That!FatherJack wrote:VARIOUS OTHER PRODUCTS ARE SHIT!
Ah yes, quite possibly the best thing about iTunes ever, is the way (If you tell it to automatically sort files) that it will order your music; I designated a folder on my C drive, to contain all my music. And iTunes makes a seperate folder for every artist, inside each of their albums, then each file inside this is named with track number and track name. This means that like FJ is trying to say, say you need to backup, its all in one place, and sorted to perfection...FatherJack wrote:My main irritation is with the arrogance of these programs that assume they are the only program you'll ever use - so all your sorting, classification and grouping has to be done within them. I sort my files using a directory structure as it's filesystem agnostic, and is retained whatever program, operating system, network or backup devices you have.
You can order files by any of the options across the top of the screen (Including genre).Dog Pants wrote:I prefer my music arranged by genre because I can listen to one artist's album in the car on CD, so at home I prefer a mix of my favourite tunes.
Fix'dpixie pie wrote:Ah yes, quite possibly the best thing about iTunes ever, is the way (If you tell it to automatically sort files) that it will order your music; I designated a folder on my C drive, to contain all my music. And iTunes makes a seperate folder for every artist, inside each of their albums, then each file inside this is named with track number and track name. This means that like FJ is trying to say, say you need to backup, its all in one place, and sorted to perfection...FatherJack wrote:My main irritation is with the arrogance of these programs that assume they are the only program you'll ever use - so all your sorting, classification and grouping has to be done within them. I sort my files using a directory structure as it's filesystem agnostic, and is retained whatever program, operating system, network or backup devices you have.
You can order files by any of the options across the top of the screen (Including genre).Dog Pants wrote:I prefer my music arranged by genre because I can listen to one artist's album in the car on CD, so at home I prefer a mix of my favourite tunes.
And another very useful feature on iTunes is its ability to convert file types; a feature I've not seen on nearly enough of the other media players.
I know I'm not gonna convince some of you guys to move to iTunes, but I'd like to show you that if you broadened your mind a bit, that mac stuff does equal evil.
or you can do it yourself, from the start (as i'm sure many of us have)pixie pie wrote: Ah yes, quite possibly the best thing about iTunes ever, is the way (If you tell it to automatically sort files) that it will order your music; I designated a folder on my C drive, to contain all my music. And iTunes makes a seperate folder for every artist, inside each of their albums, then each file inside this is named with track number and track name. This means that like FJ is trying to say, say you need to backup, its all in one place, and sorted to perfection...
winamp can, i'm pretty sure wmp can with the right plugins.pixie pie wrote: And another very useful feature on iTunes is its ability to convert file types; a feature I've not seen on nearly enough of the other media players.
Oh, fuck off. personally i base all of my opinions off of my own experiences, along with those of my peers (only the ones i trust though)pixie pie wrote: I know I'm not gonna convince some of you guys to move to iTunes, but I'd like to show you that if you broadened your mind a bit, that mac stuff doesn't equal evil.
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:any of you itunes users considered winamp?
or brain cancer for that matter, i hear it's nicer than itunes.
I love you too Berk.Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Oh, fuck off.