Page 2 of 2

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 19:31
by Joose
Vowles wrote:I think logging people now and banning them now would class as entrapment I believe. Letting people think they are safe from being banned then banning them.
a good argument. If they were threatening arrest.
Besides, you can hardly claim that people think they are safe when its spelt out in intricate detail in the EULA. Its not a throwaway comment, its a huge detailed section.

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 19:45
by Vowles
But saying Dont do it, then offering no way to catch cheaters is like a store saying

"Dont rob me", Then the till person turning around leaving the till open.

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 20:56
by deject
dudes, VAC bans only keep you off of secure servers. you can still play all the single player you want, and you can always play on "non-secure servers." but since I'd rather not have to deal with teh h4x, then I shall stick to the secure ones.

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 22:19
by Jinxx
The server used in our matches is insecure and crapped out.

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 22:38
by TezzRexx
Won't teh 5punk server have VAC when it's released?

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 22:52
by Dr. kitteny berk
it will, and will be secure, but jinxx was giving misinformation (so i edited him)

right now, there's no way to make a source server vac friendly or secure :(

Posted: March 9th, 2005, 23:50
by Jinxx
Dr. Kitteny Berk wrote:it will, and will be secure, but jinxx was giving misinformation (so i edited him)
I was trying to deter Evyl Hax!*
Dr. Kitteny Berk wrote:right now, there's no way to make a source server vac friendly or secure :(
A shame.

*lies; I was just being daft.