5podcast Episode 0: The Pilot

News and important info, general banter, and suggestions for 5punk

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

:lol:
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

Nice work Wiggy, that was surprisingly fast. Especially for a 5punker. I'll have a listen later (even though I'll cringe all the way through at the sound of my own voice).
Stoat
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3291
Joined: October 8th, 2004, 15:48
Location: Sheffield, UK
Contact:

Post by Stoat »

Talky podcasts are generally mixed down to mono, which cuts the size in half. If you've got good microphones and everyone's well mixed, you could can get it down to 64kbps and still have it sound pretty good. It brings Wiggy's mix down to 38Mb.
Wiggy
5pork
5pork
Posts: 925
Joined: June 12th, 2005, 17:00
Location: Chesterfield, UK

Post by Wiggy »

If I'm honest, I wasn't too fussed about low bitrates because I found it interfered with the quality - I'll have a to mess with the music track next time, I think that's what's buggered the size.
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

Dog Pants wrote:I'll have a listen later (even though I'll cringe all the way through at the sound of my own voice).
Me too.






And my own voice! Thank you, thank you - I'm here all week.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

That wasn't bad actually. I noticed that it felt a lot more natural when we were talking in conversation rather than predefined subjects. I'd have maybe chosen different content to leave in (I'm sure everyone would have a different choice), but the quality of the editing seemed spot on to me. Rock Lobster worked well, although I'd have rather heard an instrumental, and I liked Wiggy's little narrative at the end.

Future efforts should be shorter I think - 90 minutes is a long time to listen to 5punkers rattle on. 30 would be more appealing and would prevent us burning out. We'd just have to limit ourselves to maybe an hour's recording. Also, at risk of being self depreciative, I didn't half come across like a slow-witted thick Northerner. Everyone else sounded good though.

For a first run I think that was pretty promising.
Wiggy
5pork
5pork
Posts: 925
Joined: June 12th, 2005, 17:00
Location: Chesterfield, UK

Post by Wiggy »

I must admit, I think everyone dislikes the sound of their own voice (at least when it's recorded and played back), I know I do! :lol:

Also, if anyone does have a Rock Lobster instrumental, please let me have it (as I couldn't find one)
Legoshoes
Unicorn
Unicorn
Posts: 302
Joined: November 11th, 2009, 16:28
Location: EdinBRRRRRRRRR

Post by Legoshoes »

Agreed with Dog Pants on all points.

length is a problem. (hurr hurr)
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Download it, encode it, host it yourself and stop fucking whining?
Oh right I forgot you have a low tolerance for differing opinions. Sorry for pointing something out that would save bandwidth and shorten the download time.
Shada
Shambler
Shambler
Posts: 645
Joined: October 24th, 2007, 20:55
Location: Manchester

Post by Shada »

5podcast II: Deject and Berk argue about stuff for seven hours (filesize 2gb)
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

deject wrote:Oh right I forgot you have a low tolerance for differing opinions. Sorry for pointing something out that would save bandwidth and shorten the download time.
No, I like constructive criticism, not whining like a bitch.
Stoat
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3291
Joined: October 8th, 2004, 15:48
Location: Sheffield, UK
Contact:

Post by Stoat »

Shada wrote:5podcast II: Deject and Berk argue about stuff for seven hours (filesize 2gb)
:lol:
Joose
Turret
Turret
Posts: 8090
Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors

Post by Joose »

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:No, I like constructive criticism, not whining like a bitch.
Oh, do be quiet. It absolutely was constructive criticism, stop poking the American.

As for the podcast itself: Jolly good stuff! I would agree that the more natural conversational bits worked better than the more scripted stuff, but it was all entertaining enough to be worth listening to. Maybe have the talking points in reserve for if the conversation starts to die, but other than that just let it amble on wherever it wants to? We are the kings of tangents, seems silly to try and fight that.
Dr. kitteny berk
Morbo
Morbo
Posts: 19676
Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
Contact:

Post by Dr. kitteny berk »

Constructive Criticism wrote:Talky podcasts are generally mixed down to mono, which cuts the size in half. If you've got good microphones and everyone's well mixed, you could can get it down to 64kbps and still have it sound pretty good. It brings Wiggy's mix down to 38Mb.
Just saying.
deject
Berk
Berk
Posts: 10353
Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Contact:

Post by deject »

Dr. kitteny berk wrote:
No, I like constructive criticism, not whining like a bitch.
Dude, 75MB is a unusually large size for podcasts. It's not like changing the compression options when it's encoded is soooooooooooooooo difficult. Shit, if you're going to whine like a bitch because I pointed something out I'll do the legwork and find the ideal settings, and all that shit.

edit: Also, if I came across like I was knocking the work that has been done then I'm sorry but all I am doing is just pointing out that the file size is too big for what it is. I haven't been involved at any point in this, so to re-encode and host it purely because it's a large file is just asinine. If you guys want I can try my hand at mastering/encoding/file hosting. Instead, you're just being wholly unfluffy.
Last edited by deject on August 31st, 2010, 21:33, edited 1 time in total.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

Joose wrote:As for the podcast itself: Jolly good stuff! I would agree that the more natural conversational bits worked better than the more scripted stuff, but it was all entertaining enough to be worth listening to. Maybe have the talking points in reserve for if the conversation starts to die, but other than that just let it amble on wherever it wants to? We are the kings of tangents, seems silly to try and fight that.
The problem with the conversation aspect is that it tends to be 5punkers rambling on, which may be funny and interesting to us, but it's not really a reason for anyone else to want to listen. Maybe a middle ground of directed conversation rather than forced discussion points and meandering chat.
Roman Totale
Robotic Bumlord
Robotic Bumlord
Posts: 8475
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 0:27
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Roman Totale »

Dog Pants wrote:The problem with the conversation aspect is that it tends to be 5punkers rambling on, which may be funny and interesting to us, but it's not really a reason for anyone else to want to listen. Maybe a middle ground of directed conversation rather than forced discussion points and meandering chat.
Perhaps we could get a non-5punker to have a listen and review?
Thompy
Shambler In Drag
Shambler In Drag
Posts: 768
Joined: July 9th, 2010, 13:34

Post by Thompy »

Roman Totale wrote:
Perhaps we could get a non-5punker to have a listen and review?
I'm not familiar with 5punky ways yet, so I can perhaps give a pretty good outsider perspective on it. I didn't get a chance to listen today but will do tomorrow. One thing I would say already though (although said already), just personally, it's a bit too long for one sitting, even with nout better to do.
Joose
Turret
Turret
Posts: 8090
Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors

Post by Joose »

Roman Totale wrote:
Perhaps we could get a non-5punker to have a listen and review?
Good thought. I know someone who is a podcasting afficionado, I'll see what she thinks of it.
Dog Pants wrote:The problem with the conversation aspect is that it tends to be 5punkers rambling on, which may be funny and interesting to us, but it's not really a reason for anyone else to want to listen.
I dunno about that. I listen to the Rooster Teeth podcast every week, and it is pretty much exclusively just them rambling on about whatever comes to mind. Its funny, even though a lot of it is just them bitching at each other. Not saying it would definitely work, but as long as it didn't just descend into a string of in jokes that no-one outside of 5punk understands, it could work.
ProfHawking
Zombie
Zombie
Posts: 2101
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 21:31

Post by ProfHawking »

I had a listen last night, nicely done guys. Some funny stuff in there.

I think it would be good to get some kind of standard of audio quality if possible though. Some of you come across clearly, others not.

Wiggy wrote:Also, if anyone does have a Rock Lobster instrumental, please let me have it (as I couldn't find one)
http://clintweb.co.uk/random/rocklobster.mp3
Post Reply