5punk

.

ROUND 2!! FIGHT!!

Sapphrine wrote:Whilst i'm glad people are calming down I want butter to explain his accusation or cede that he is no better than what he just belittled in the post above. 'baseless accusations they can't back up'. Not only that but utter and total smear statement as well. I've not hidden my dislike for butter in the slightest. I've stated it clearly, i've lost my rag, calmed down, moved corps to make a point and on top of it, I've then taken time out to actually go away and come back with constructive points as to how we can improve the alliance.

I want to know where butter gets off accusing me of this, something wedie clearly feel strongly about whilst acting a martyr and hard done by BWL.

If we're good to go on just throwing out random statements without backing i've got quite a stash of speculations to make... alot involve elves and santa clause and the merits in pvp Smile i suspect they're as helpful as much of the above.

*BOSH!* *BIFF!* *BANG!*

Butter Dog wrote:Sapph, we've seen everyone with access to that thread, we know who viewed it, forums mods can do that y'know. Its only about 15 Hobo members.

You're the only one who is that friendly with BWL, out of those who viewed it, and the only one who had previous issues with me, out of all those who viewed it.

Doesn't take a genius to work it out.

*BANG! *KICK!* *SWIRLEY KICK SOUND EFFECT!*

Sapphrine wrote:All members of Pilots and moderators can see that forum. You know that as well as I. So that makes the possible grouping any of the wedie pilots, steamy, james, friz or myself.... as i said about 20 of which 4 aren't in wedie.

Butter Dog wrote:What part of 'we know who viewed the thread' dont you understand?

FINISH HIM!!

Fear Not wrote:I call bullshit, phpbb2 uses cookies to store this information, and whilst there is a new option to track it in the database, eamped do not give database access, and we use cookies anyway.

Unless you have a specific mod installed to do this.

FATALITY!!

<3 rabbit

And I can't see that forum either. So boo sux to you too Sapph! AHAHAHAHA 5punk owns all

I'm just glad to learn that the CEO's have the right to discuss censure and expulsion of a member. Some people's conduct is just unbecoming of BUM, imho, and shouldn't be tolerated while it affects the play of others. I spent a good amount of time looking through our BUM info on whether there is a system in place for people that are just abrasive like Butter, not really attacking/flaming/griefing people, but really not behaving properly either. And whilst I'm curious as hell as to who leaked info to BWL, Butter's conduct does speak for itself, whether you know the sneaky backroom details or not. I also would like to admit the same fault of sneaky backroom discussions regarding him, as I have posted such here. I'm not proud of it, but to me, if action of some sort is not taken, we're all condoning his behavior, which I believe we should not.

I am glad I posted the original post here, as it at least can be compared to the one on the BUM forum for editing now. Butter accused somebody from BWL of editing it, we have the original from before it was attacked by the buttery one.

any questions?

ps

this is so lame the whole lot of it, makes me want to go to wow at least there i have Oh Yeah!

I found some fluff.

Have some, I insist

Pfff. What do you think I've been playing these last two days? Me, steamy and Waagaa :D

At your request I have sufficiently fluffed the BUM forums

friznit wrote:Pfff. What do you think I've been playing these last two days? Me, steamy and Waagaa :D

/me gets on tin foil hat

Now I'm not one for giving a shit about EVE politics, but butter dog's posts in that thread just seem to strengthen BWL's point if you ask me.

Pretty much! He's definitely one for digging himself deeper into a hole isn't he?

Algey won't kick him without empiric evidence of a specific wrong doing, which of course we can't give because all evidence is circumstantial at best. To be fair on Algey, I'd do exactly the same if this was in relation to any 5punkers. So we best get used to him being a twat from time to time. If it gets too much, we can always leave

friznit wrote:Pretty much! He's definitely one for digging himself deeper into a hole isn't he?

Algey won't kick him without empiric evidence of a specific wrong doing, which of course we can't give because all evidence is circumstantial at best. To be fair on Algey, I'd do exactly the same if this was in relation to any 5punkers. So we best get used to him being a Danny Baker from time to time. If it gets too much, we can always leave

It's not as if it's our decision to do anything about him - he's not in our corp, and he's not a 5punker - it's up to his corp's boss as to whether keeping him is worth the potential breakup of the alliance.

I didn't know any of the guys who left, but as "mature, immature" gamers they sounded like fun.

If anyone is witness to him treating people unpleasantly though, there's nothing to stop you saying it's out of order - as Dres mentioned, your silence may be seen by him as vindication.

FatherJack wrote:If anyone is witness to him treating people unpleasantly though, there's nothing to stop you saying it's out of order - as Dres mentioned, your silence may be seen by him as vindication.

Don't worry, Friz called him a cock on teamspeak the other day

If I think people are a cupcake or a twat or even a wow hater I tell it to their face (sorry, loving the word replacement therapy a bit too much). If enough people did it, he'd get the point eventually. Well, it worked for wabbit anyway.

friznit wrote:Well, it worked for wabbit anyway.

choose your words carefully when addressing this topic