Page 70 of 75
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: December 24th, 2015, 19:46
by FatherJack
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: December 25th, 2015, 10:02
by Roman Totale
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: December 25th, 2015, 10:11
by buzzmong
Yessss! The red-band version is out as well, basically the same though.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: December 31st, 2015, 0:12
by buzzmong
Despite making a load of money on KS/Indiegogo and looking like it was actually going to be made, lawyers are now involved:
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 91126.html
Boo, hiss and all that, as it looked like it could be quite decent.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: December 31st, 2015, 4:30
by FatherJack
It's probably okay as it's not-for-profit as stated in the wills of the creator and his late wife, the only thing they could argue was whether it was infringing the JJ Abrams-era stuff, and who the fuck want to copy that?
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: December 31st, 2015, 11:42
by spoodie
I'm not clear why this one is different from all the other fan made Star Trek works, like
Star Trek Continues and
Star Trek Phase II. If it's the Kickstarter, both of those other examples accept donations, so that doesn't really add up.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 6th, 2016, 23:48
by Joose
What is happing in this trailer?
[youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmbU8RlAmF8[/youtube]
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 7th, 2016, 9:23
by fabyak
Japan
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 7th, 2016, 17:30
by Roman Totale
High-Rise
[youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYmY2tBYins[/youtube]
Very much looking forwards to this as I loved the book. The author, JG Ballard, also wrote Empire of the Sun, Crash, and The Atrocity Exhibition. The latter is fucking bonkers, but is very similar to Naked Lunch if you like that sort of thing (which I do, a lot).
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 7th, 2016, 19:13
by Mr. Johnson
I, too, look forward to that. Didn't read any of those books though. Yet.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 8th, 2016, 19:51
by spoodie
Looks like the usual madness from Ben Wheatley, I loved A Field in England.
And I learned there's an audiobook read by Tom Hiddleston. But to watch the film before listening to that?
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 15th, 2016, 15:50
by Roman Totale
10 Cloverfield Lane
[youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQy-ANhnUpE[/youtube]
I was all set to mock the need for a Cloverfield sequel, but that trailer actually makes it look interesting.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 15th, 2016, 16:03
by Mr. Johnson
True, and it's not found footage this time which is a minor plus. I do hope they've got a different monster though, because the cloverfield one was shit.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 15th, 2016, 16:55
by Dog Pants
Ooh, interesting. Certainly is a different direction. And I thought the Cloverfield monster was great until you saw it, and then it was just a kind of Godzilla thing. Still fine, but it's just one of those things.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 15th, 2016, 20:45
by FatherJack
Of the last three trailers, the vampire yakuza one makes the most sense to me. I couldn't work out what high rise was supposed to be about from the trailer and I didn't watch Cloverfield because it sounded tedious for the reasons Pants describes.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 20th, 2016, 20:08
by Roman Totale
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: January 21st, 2016, 21:19
by Roman Totale
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: March 3rd, 2016, 19:02
by Dog Pants
Ghostbusters
[youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ugHP-yZXw[/youtube]
So yeah. Dunno.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: March 3rd, 2016, 19:13
by buzzmong
Yeaaahh. I know it's a trailer, but it screams slapstick comedy trying to be funny and riff of the originals, rather than being like the originals which had a semi-serious plot and base, but with comedic moments.
Could go either way due to it being trailer. Don't have much hopes though considering the shots of the pistols and the punching that sneaked in there.
Re: Movie Trailers
Posted: March 6th, 2016, 15:35
by Roman Totale
Is Hollywood capable of making a comedic, black, female character that isn't the same old hashed out 'sassy, loud, "oh no you didn't!"' cliche? It's embarrassing. I mean the Fresh Prince of Bel Air managed it 20 years, so why is it such a problem now?
Other than that I agree with Buzz - I get the impression it's going to be slapstick and insufferably knowing. Still, it's incredibly entertaining watching some people lose their shit because it's an all female cast. Can't say I'll be watching it though.
Side note: I was reading something the other day about reboots of 80s films. It said something along the lines of 'the people who they are aimed at [30-40 year olds] are the ones who aren't actually going to the cinema any more'. It pointed to the poor showings of the Point Break, Robocop, Total Recall etc reboots (though it could have been that they were just shit). Instead we're now going to be seeing more 90s reboots - Men in Black, Independence Day (technically a sequel) etc, and even the recent Spongebob film apparently did well.
Question: is this a good thing? Personally I've always found self-declared "90s kids" to be far more obnoxiously nostalgia driven than most (I think I probably fall into the technical category of a 90s kid having been born in the early 80s, but I'm specifically referring to the ones that bang on constantly about how the 90s were the best thing ever). People have moaned in the past about the lack of originality and remakes, so is it going to get worse?
Remember people: nostalgia is a disease that kills forward thinking and originality. They say that those who forgot the past are doomed to repeat it, but I say those who don't stop looking at the past are doomed trip up and fall on their face.