Page 7 of 10

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 18:50
by MORDETH LESTOK
:boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie: :boogie:
Image


I made the list after 48hours :ahoy:


Image

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 18:53
by Dog Pants
Woo! Check me out in the top ten!

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 19:26
by deject
yay top 5 for me! I gotta stay ahead of sheriff...

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 19:44
by MORDETH LESTOK
Whats your stats on the Folding?

For me:
CPU 50% on my 2.8ghz
1st WU = 5000 Frames at 33s/Frame 2d
2nd WU = 500 Frames at 4m35s/Frame 1d13h

it nearly killed my wimpy laptop at 100% and still was gonna take 89days lol

just wondering if thats normal? :?

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 19:47
by Dr. kitteny berk
how do you tell?

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 20:25
by MORDETH LESTOK
i have the current GUI program for XP and it shows frames count and speed and estimated finish time...etc

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 20:33
by Dr. kitteny berk
ahh, I don't do the gui version (as it performs worse than the console version)]

Pretty much you should expect it to eat 100% of a single core cpu, and ~50% of a multi-core cpu.

Your performance sounds ok, depends how big the WUs are etc, but pretty much if it's going, it's doing all it can. (and fucking the atmosphere) :)

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 20:53
by deject
yeah I also run the console version.

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 21:33
by Sheriff Fatman
deject wrote:yay top 5 for me! I gotta stay ahead of sheriff...
Hehe. I haven't put it back on since my last re-format, but I'll be back :clap:

There is a nifty tool here if anyone wants pretty pictures to show your current progress.

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 22:27
by ProfHawking
console version?
is that different to just having it minimised then..
worth being arsed to change?

Posted: March 30th, 2007, 22:36
by Dr. kitteny berk
ProfHawking wrote:console version?
is that different to just having it minimised then..
worth being arsed to change?
well, yeah, i suspect minimised it still worries about rendering stuff to a level, the console version has none of that crap in the way

Posted: March 31st, 2007, 0:45
by deject
I like the console version because it is 100% invisible. If my computer is on, F@H is running, even though there is no icon or anything to tell you. The only indication at all is the process in the Task Manager.

Posted: March 31st, 2007, 0:48
by Dr. kitteny berk
deject wrote:I like the console version because it is 100% invisible. If my computer is on, F@H is running, even though there is no icon or anything to tell you. The only indication at all is the process in the Task Manager.
That^ apart from the whole core2 thing making my room melt.


30-35c under normal use
50c when F@H

Posted: August 1st, 2007, 0:57
by Dr. kitteny berk
Bumpity Bump.

FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD.

/subliminal spamming

Posted: August 1st, 2007, 18:41
by thewombleofdeath
which one is the one that i want?

no-nonsense text only version
or
SMP client console version

Posted: August 1st, 2007, 18:43
by Dr. kitteny berk
no-nonsense text only version

the other is a beta for multicpu/core pcs.

Posted: August 27th, 2007, 20:01
by Grimmie
Just completed my third WU at home.
My next WU is 5000 Frames long, which isn't so bad.

It's estimated at 36,308,074 minutes / frame.
That's thirty-six million, three-hundred-and-eight thousand, and seventy-four minutes per frame.

Estimated end in 4459 days, 22 hours, 9 minutes and 4 seconds.
Think I'll get it done before the deadline? :lol:

Posted: August 27th, 2007, 21:29
by deject
hahaha maybe in 12 years you can buy a computer to compute the WU :lol:

Posted: August 27th, 2007, 21:50
by Grimmie
Image

Posted: August 27th, 2007, 21:51
by Dr. kitteny berk
:lol: