Folding@5punk

MORDETH LESTOK · Post by **MORDETH LESTOK** » March 30th, 2007, 18:50

I made the list after 48hours

Post by **Dog Pants** » March 30th, 2007, 18:53

Woo! Check me out in the top ten!

Post by **deject** » March 30th, 2007, 19:26

yay top 5 for me! I gotta stay ahead of sheriff...

MORDETH LESTOK · Post by **MORDETH LESTOK** » March 30th, 2007, 19:44

Whats your stats on the Folding?

For me:
CPU 50% on my 2.8ghz
1st WU = 5000 Frames at 33s/Frame 2d
2nd WU = 500 Frames at 4m35s/Frame 1d13h

it nearly killed my wimpy laptop at 100% and still was gonna take 89days lol

just wondering if thats normal?

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » March 30th, 2007, 19:47

how do you tell?

MORDETH LESTOK · Post by **MORDETH LESTOK** » March 30th, 2007, 20:25

i have the current GUI program for XP and it shows frames count and speed and estimated finish time...etc

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » March 30th, 2007, 20:33

ahh, I don't do the gui version (as it performs worse than the console version)]

Pretty much you should expect it to eat 100% of a single core cpu, and ~50% of a multi-core cpu.

Your performance sounds ok, depends how big the WUs are etc, but pretty much if it's going, it's doing all it can. (and fucking the atmosphere)

Post by **deject** » March 30th, 2007, 20:53

yeah I also run the console version.

Sheriff Fatman · Post by **Sheriff Fatman** » March 30th, 2007, 21:33

deject wrote:yay top 5 for me! I gotta stay ahead of sheriff...

Hehe. I haven't put it back on since my last re-format, but I'll be back

There is a nifty tool here if anyone wants pretty pictures to show your current progress.

Post by **ProfHawking** » March 30th, 2007, 22:27

console version?
is that different to just having it minimised then..
worth being arsed to change?

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » March 30th, 2007, 22:36

ProfHawking wrote:console version?
is that different to just having it minimised then..
worth being arsed to change?

well, yeah, i suspect minimised it still worries about rendering stuff to a level, the console version has none of that crap in the way

Post by **deject** » March 31st, 2007, 0:45

I like the console version because it is 100% invisible. If my computer is on, F@H is running, even though there is no icon or anything to tell you. The only indication at all is the process in the Task Manager.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » March 31st, 2007, 0:48

deject wrote:I like the console version because it is 100% invisible. If my computer is on, F@H is running, even though there is no icon or anything to tell you. The only indication at all is the process in the Task Manager.

That^ apart from the whole core2 thing making my room melt.

30-35c under normal use
50c when F@H

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » August 1st, 2007, 0:57

Bumpity Bump.

FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD. FOLD.

/subliminal spamming

thewombleofdeath · Post by **thewombleofdeath** » August 1st, 2007, 18:41

which one is the one that i want?

no-nonsense text only version
or
SMP client console version

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » August 1st, 2007, 18:43

no-nonsense text only version

the other is a beta for multicpu/core pcs.

Post by **Grimmie** » August 27th, 2007, 20:01

Just completed my third WU at home.
My next WU is 5000 Frames long, which isn't so bad.

It's estimated at 36,308,074 minutes / frame.
That's thirty-six million, three-hundred-and-eight thousand, and seventy-four minutes per frame.

Estimated end in 4459 days, 22 hours, 9 minutes and 4 seconds.
Think I'll get it done before the deadline?

Post by **deject** » August 27th, 2007, 21:29

hahaha maybe in 12 years you can buy a computer to compute the WU

Post by **Grimmie** » August 27th, 2007, 21:50

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » August 27th, 2007, 21:51