Page 6 of 6

Posted: September 28th, 2006, 14:37
by Dr. kitteny berk
cashy wrote:is anybody else having problems with the main torrent site? i havnt been able to load it for days now :(
Tried opening hamachi? ;)

Posted: September 28th, 2006, 19:37
by cashy
ha! thats the kind of trickery i like

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 19:47
by FatherJack
Just did some testing, seems I can't connect to the tracker if only using the TorrentOf5punk2 or 3 network in Ham & Cheese, only TorrentOf5punk.

I see Profserver, but it greys out when I disconnect from the original network.

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 20:55
by ProfHawking
hmm

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 21:25
by ProfHawking
ok i think its fixed.
i didnt update the registry when i added the new networks.
Its caus ive got it running as a service it makes it a little more fiddley.

Have a go now if you please

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 22:28
by FatherJack
Well it works as far as connecting to the tracker - but to peers on the other network, no :(

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 22:36
by Dr. kitteny berk
FatherJack wrote:Well it works as far as connecting to the tracker - but to peers on the other network, no :(
This is pretty much as I expected. it *SHOULD* be possible if people were to enable DHT. but it needs testing.

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 22:48
by Dr. kitteny berk
have stuck a torrent on for testing in utorrent with dht enabled etc. we'll see what happens

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 23:38
by Fred Woogle
I'm just connected to torrentof5pnk2 and I connect and disconnect, but don't get any data

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 23:41
by Fred Woogle
the easyest option I can think of, but also a messy one, is to have many many networks with everyone connected to everyone atleast once.....

Posted: October 1st, 2006, 23:44
by Dr. kitteny berk
Ty aka Sir Die Aloty wrote:the easyest option I can think of, but also a messy one, is to have many many networks with everyone connected to everyone atleast once.....
that would work, but it'd be fucking horrific to work out.


i vote we do it :)

Posted: October 2nd, 2006, 1:31
by Hehulk
I vote we do it if someone other than me does the hard work.

Posted: October 2nd, 2006, 1:35
by Dr. kitteny berk
Hehulk wrote:I vote we do it if someone other than me does the hard work.
That.

I vote hawking

Posted: October 2nd, 2006, 8:18
by ProfHawking
:lol:
ill do it this afternoon if i can.
yays messy solutions

Posted: October 2nd, 2006, 11:46
by FatherJack
As I see it, using the existing userbase, if we all stayed in TO5, but half also joined TO52 and the other half also joined TO53 any new users would just join TO52 and TO53. Until we filled 2&3 up, then it would get more complex.

Perhaps we should have a thread to count the number of potential people who want to do this and work from there.

Posted: October 2nd, 2006, 12:38
by Fear
If bukake really isn't limited on bandwidth you could just use windows networking to bridge the 3 (or however many) networks. Maybe a few routing table additions, but that would work, I think.

It would be seamless to everyone else so long as the subnet was 255.0.0.0 (as I think the ham network is 5.*.*.*

Posted: October 2nd, 2006, 12:48
by FatherJack
Kind of defeats the purpose if everyone has to connect through a hub, with everyone seeing everyone else in at least one network, it's more resilient as only that link is required to seed to them. Plus you can see who's downloading off you if you want to chat with them about the files.