Torrent of 5punk

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » September 28th, 2006, 14:37

cashy wrote:is anybody else having problems with the main torrent site? i havnt been able to load it for days now

Tried opening hamachi?

cashy · Post by **cashy** » September 28th, 2006, 19:37

ha! thats the kind of trickery i like

Post by **FatherJack** » October 1st, 2006, 19:47

Just did some testing, seems I can't connect to the tracker if only using the TorrentOf5punk2 or 3 network in Ham & Cheese, only TorrentOf5punk.

I see Profserver, but it greys out when I disconnect from the original network.

Post by **ProfHawking** » October 1st, 2006, 20:55

Post by **ProfHawking** » October 1st, 2006, 21:25

ok i think its fixed.
i didnt update the registry when i added the new networks.
Its caus ive got it running as a service it makes it a little more fiddley.

Have a go now if you please

Post by **FatherJack** » October 1st, 2006, 22:28

Well it works as far as connecting to the tracker - but to peers on the other network, no

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » October 1st, 2006, 22:36

FatherJack wrote:Well it works as far as connecting to the tracker - but to peers on the other network, no

This is pretty much as I expected. it *SHOULD* be possible if people were to enable DHT. but it needs testing.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » October 1st, 2006, 22:48

have stuck a torrent on for testing in utorrent with dht enabled etc. we'll see what happens

Fred Woogle · Post by **Fred Woogle** » October 1st, 2006, 23:38

I'm just connected to torrentof5pnk2 and I connect and disconnect, but don't get any data

Fred Woogle · Post by **Fred Woogle** » October 1st, 2006, 23:41

the easyest option I can think of, but also a messy one, is to have many many networks with everyone connected to everyone atleast once.....

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » October 1st, 2006, 23:44

Ty aka Sir Die Aloty wrote:the easyest option I can think of, but also a messy one, is to have many many networks with everyone connected to everyone atleast once.....

that would work, but it'd be fucking horrific to work out.

i vote we do it

Hehulk · Post by **Hehulk** » October 2nd, 2006, 1:31

I vote we do it if someone other than me does the hard work.

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » October 2nd, 2006, 1:35

Hehulk wrote:I vote we do it if someone other than me does the hard work.

That.

I vote hawking

Post by **ProfHawking** » October 2nd, 2006, 8:18

ill do it this afternoon if i can.
yays messy solutions

Post by **FatherJack** » October 2nd, 2006, 11:46

As I see it, using the existing userbase, if we all stayed in TO5, but half also joined TO52 and the other half also joined TO53 any new users would just join TO52 and TO53. Until we filled 2&3 up, then it would get more complex.

Perhaps we should have a thread to count the number of potential people who want to do this and work from there.

Fear · Post by **Fear** » October 2nd, 2006, 12:38

If bukake really isn't limited on bandwidth you could just use windows networking to bridge the 3 (or however many) networks. Maybe a few routing table additions, but that would work, I think.

It would be seamless to everyone else so long as the subnet was 255.0.0.0 (as I think the ham network is 5.*.*.*

Post by **FatherJack** » October 2nd, 2006, 12:48

Kind of defeats the purpose if everyone has to connect through a hub, with everyone seeing everyone else in at least one network, it's more resilient as only that link is required to seed to them. Plus you can see who's downloading off you if you want to chat with them about the files.