H4x am wank

Post by **Joose** » March 9th, 2005, 19:31

Vowles wrote:I think logging people now and banning them now would class as entrapment I believe. Letting people think they are safe from being banned then banning them.

a good argument. If they were threatening arrest.
Besides, you can hardly claim that people think they are safe when its spelt out in intricate detail in the EULA. Its not a throwaway comment, its a huge detailed section.

Vowles · Post by **Vowles** » March 9th, 2005, 19:45

But saying Dont do it, then offering no way to catch cheaters is like a store saying

"Dont rob me", Then the till person turning around leaving the till open.

Post by **deject** » March 9th, 2005, 20:56

dudes, VAC bans only keep you off of secure servers. you can still play all the single player you want, and you can always play on "non-secure servers." but since I'd rather not have to deal with teh h4x, then I shall stick to the secure ones.

Jinxx · Post by **Jinxx** » March 9th, 2005, 22:19

The server used in our matches is insecure and crapped out.

Post by **TezzRexx** » March 9th, 2005, 22:38

Won't teh 5punk server have VAC when it's released?

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » March 9th, 2005, 22:52

it will, and will be secure, but jinxx was giving misinformation (so i edited him)

right now, there's no way to make a source server vac friendly or secure

Jinxx · Post by **Jinxx** » March 9th, 2005, 23:50

Dr. Kitteny Berk wrote:it will, and will be secure, but jinxx was giving misinformation (so i edited him)

I was trying to deter Evyl Hax!*

Dr. Kitteny Berk wrote:right now, there's no way to make a source server vac friendly or secure

A shame.

*lies; I was just being daft.