I agreeGrimmie wrote:NORKS.
A suggestion.
Moderator: Forum Moderators
I too think it should just have a join and remove option for each game rather than anything too complicated. If you're unable or not willing to play the game online but still have it, then dont add yourself to the list for that game. It's more a tool for other people to see who they can play a game with rather than showing off your game collection I guess.
-
- Heavy
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: October 10th, 2004, 17:36
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Contact:
I think a set list is the only way to go, otherwise people will fuck about adding stupid stuff, and it will be another area to moderate, which would be a pain in the ass.Dog Pants wrote:How to create the list of games? Is it going to be a set list of the main games catered for by 5punk (the ones with icons for example) or will we be able to add our own in there (Pippa Funnel's Riding School for example)?
Hvaing a list of all the games we have icons for (i.e. one's we tend to play a lot) would be good, however as somebody above mentioned, they want to know what games other people play, incase it's never been mentioned on 5punk etc...
Bit of a tough one really, I'm actually unsure of how to best do it, even though it is a cracking idea.
It would be the 5cheduler game list- that way when we add a new game to the list it'll be automatically added in here.Dog Pants wrote:How to create the list of games? Is it going to be a set list of the main games catered for by 5punk (the ones with icons for example) or will we be able to add our own in there (Pippa Funnel's Riding School for example)?
I was wondering on how to integrate it. How about:
- a "Who has this?" link when you're choosing a game to play in the 5cheduler.
- a [my games] button at the bottom of your posts.
That means you can search for what games a certain user has and also search for which users have a certain game.
Thoughts?
-
- Heavy
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: October 10th, 2004, 17:36
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Contact:
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
I'd suggestStoat wrote:It would be the 5cheduler game list- that way when we add a new game to the list it'll be automatically added in here.Dog Pants wrote:How to create the list of games? Is it going to be a set list of the main games catered for by 5punk (the ones with icons for example) or will we be able to add our own in there (Pippa Funnel's Riding School for example)?
I was wondering on how to integrate it. How about:
- a "Who has this?" link when you're choosing a game to play in the 5cheduler.
- a [my games] button at the bottom of your posts.
That means you can search for what games a certain user has and also search for which users have a certain game.
Thoughts?
- a mechanism to view the games list without actually starting to schedule a game
- a way to request games to be added to the list
- some sort of announcement when new games are added so people can say if they own them or not
Where would you link from?FatherJack wrote: I'd suggest
- a mechanism to view the games list without actually starting to schedule a game
A Poll would be enough for that, wouldn't it?FatherJack wrote:- a way to request games to be added to the list
Good plan.FatherJack wrote:- some sort of announcement when new games are added so people can say if they own them or not
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
Um, maybe a 'games' link on the 5cheduler page, or even a new 'games' menu at the top - it just seems a bit tricky to find if you have to 'pretend' to schedule a game, but it would okay as long as we all knew that's where it wasStoat wrote:Where would you link from?FatherJack wrote: I'd suggest
- a mechanism to view the games list without actually starting to schedule a game
Or just a normal thread dedicated to requests - if a couple of people have a valid game request it shouldn't need a massive vote.Stoat wrote:A Poll would be enough for that, wouldn't it?FatherJack wrote:- a way to request games to be added to the list
how about a sticky where you simply post as and when you get a game, with big letters ontop saying "NO CONVERSATIONS FOR PENALTY OF SNPG'ISM".Stoat wrote:A Poll would be enough for that, wouldn't it?FatherJack wrote:- a way to request games to be added to the list
that way you could compile a whacking great big list of who has what for what platform etc, as if you have a poll then you still wont know exactly who has what game
/edit god dam you jack, your too fast for my liking
-
- Site Owner
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: May 16th, 2005, 15:31
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Contact:
It's a good point about keeping the thread clean - see, for example the XFire add games forum: it's mostly full of people repeating, saying pleeeeeease or "bump".cashy wrote: how about a sticky where you simply post as and when you get a game, with big letters ontop saying "NO CONVERSATIONS FOR PENALTY OF SNPG'ISM".
that way you could compile a whacking great big list of who has what for what platform etc, as if you have a poll then you still wont know exactly who has what game
/edit god dam you jack, your too fast for my liking
Just a one-liner for a new game, or maybe a short-ish list of games people actively have an interest in would make life a lot easier for the person/s editing the master list.
-
- Turret
- Posts: 8090
- Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
- Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors
I realise this would make more work for the code-monkeys, but would it not be possible to sort of automate the adding of games, through some kind of voting system. As in, someone suggests a new game to be added, then if more than two other people vote for it, it auto-magically adds to the list. That way it wouldnt take as much mod time, but would limit the amount of random shite that gets added.
Does that make sense?
Does that make sense?
So it would only take two people to add I Love Horses as a game? I think that might require some mod attentionJoose wrote:I realise this would make more work for the code-monkeys, but would it not be possible to sort of automate the adding of games, through some kind of voting system. As in, someone suggests a new game to be added, then if more than two other people vote for it, it auto-magically adds to the list. That way it wouldnt take as much mod time, but would limit the amount of random shite that gets added.
Does that make sense?
Nice idea though.
Pfffft, my thoughts exactlyspoodie wrote:So it would only take two people to add I Love Horses as a game? I think that might require some mod attentionJoose wrote:I realise this would make more work for the code-monkeys, but would it not be possible to sort of automate the adding of games, through some kind of voting system. As in, someone suggests a new game to be added, then if more than two other people vote for it, it auto-magically adds to the list. That way it wouldnt take as much mod time, but would limit the amount of random shite that gets added.
Does that make sense?
Nice idea though.
-
- Turret
- Posts: 8090
- Joined: October 13th, 2004, 14:13
- Location: The house of Un-Earthly horrors
spoodie wrote: So it would only take two people to add I Love Horses as a game? I think that might require some mod attention
Nice idea though.
note, limit. Not stop entirely. Just means the mods wouldnt have *quite* as much to do. Plus, if you read what I said right, its three people: one to suggest then two more to go "yes, I also have this".Joose wrote:limit the amount of random shite that gets added.
Just means that you wont have to wait for mods to add games, but you wont get games listed that only one or two people actually have. Without having the thing entirely manually driven (which could be a pain in the arse), you're never going to totally escape the possibility of "I Love Horses".
It's probably easier to have users add games with a voting system (I doubt the regular boarders will create too much crap once the initial excitement dies down). Compare the workload of deleting the odd 'I Love Horses' entry to having a mod manually enter every game someone wants. Of course everything depends more on how easily Stoat can implement the stuff we come up with, but the member-driven approach would be my choice.
This is probably right I reckon. I have utmost faith in Stoat's majickal codery powerz! GO GO CODEZ!Dog Pants wrote:It's probably easier to have users add games with a voting system (I doubt the regular boarders will create too much crap once the initial excitement dies down). Compare the workload of deleting the odd 'I Love Horses' entry to having a mod manually enter every game someone wants. Of course everything depends more on how easily Stoat can implement the stuff we come up with, but the member-driven approach would be my choice.