Windows 7 editions revealed
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Salmon Ninja Pirate Gayer
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: December 13th, 2006, 14:27
Windows 7 editions revealed
Windows 7 editions revealed
Microsoft has given official news about the different versions of Windows 7 that will be hitting the market - and it's even more confusing than Fista was.
Category: News
Publish Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:45:13 +0000
Read more...
Source: bit-tech.net Feed
Description: Computer hardware, games and technology reviews and news
Microsoft has given official news about the different versions of Windows 7 that will be hitting the market - and it's even more confusing than Fista was.
Category: News
Publish Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:45:13 +0000
Read more...
Source: bit-tech.net Feed
Description: Computer hardware, games and technology reviews and news
Just explorer, services and svchost takes up the three spots you chimps.The Starter edition will only be available under an OEM licensing agreement, and will restrict users to three running applications at any one time.
Seriously, get back to the XP edition naming convention, call everything that sucks "Home" and everything that is kind of good "Professional".
Not really, I never got why people insisted on having the most expensive edition despite the fact that the extra features are pointless for 99% of people.Baliame wrote:GIVE ME MY EDIT BUTTON.
Obviously, Ultimate is the way to go.
XP pro offers nothing over home that I'd actually need, and nothing above Fista home premium offers anything useful to most people.
I'll be getting whichever version my uni gives away for free.
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Lee wrote:Not really, I never got why people insisted on having the most expensive edition despite the fact that the extra features are pointless for 99% of people.
XP pro offers nothing over home that I'd actually need, and nothing above Fista home premium offers anything useful to most people.
I'll be getting whichever version my uni gives away for free.
Apart from the XP home thing, ISTR it only had simple file sharing, which is fucking horrible.
Price doesn't matter since I'm not buying it, and Ultimate comes with the most features, and, though unlikely, if I would ever happen to need them, I wouldn't have to do a full reOSsing.Lee wrote:Not really, I never got why people insisted on having the most expensive edition despite the fact that the extra features are pointless for 99% of people.
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
What a bunch of tarts. I think I'll go for home premium.
In regard to xp home/pro I've used both a lot in terms of setting up internets stuff and networks stuff. I have never really had any problems with the homo version, file sharing was a piece of piss, sharing files/folders and entire partitions if needed took a few seconds.
In regard to xp home/pro I've used both a lot in terms of setting up internets stuff and networks stuff. I have never really had any problems with the homo version, file sharing was a piece of piss, sharing files/folders and entire partitions if needed took a few seconds.
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
I've generally found that I find trouble with people who don't pay attention to what they're doing and then wander over going 'can you fix this?' whilst pointing vaguely at something they cocked up.
I've just spent a few hours with a very engrish router/modem trying to set up wireless. Turns out tiscali use an mtu of 1432 and a PPPoA wrapper to up the mtu to 1460. Turns out the modem doesn't see this automatically and of course sets itself to an mtu of 1500 which = 100% packet loss. I'd forgotten how to set max mtu with cmd and had taken the other modem out of action. In the end trial and error had me arrive at those numbers and here I am. Sort of. Still got some things to poke.
I've just spent a few hours with a very engrish router/modem trying to set up wireless. Turns out tiscali use an mtu of 1432 and a PPPoA wrapper to up the mtu to 1460. Turns out the modem doesn't see this automatically and of course sets itself to an mtu of 1500 which = 100% packet loss. I'd forgotten how to set max mtu with cmd and had taken the other modem out of action. In the end trial and error had me arrive at those numbers and here I am. Sort of. Still got some things to poke.