for anyone interested or wanting to compare their e-penis to mine, i just overclocked my machine a lil, 2.66Ghz cpu and gfx @ 489Mhz/ 1.32Ghz, and ran 3Dmark05, scoring 8518.
deject wrote:SPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED DEMON! I mean, 3.2 megahertz? shiiiiiiiiiit...
Well, I thought that everyone else here has their 10.6THZ boards with custom made video cards forged from the souls of Tibetian refugees and Bob Ross. That's why I have to bow with my mediocre hardware.
deject wrote:couldn't you get an AMD board? Intel is just so, passé.
To be honest, I really didn't look for anything else. My sitpulations were that I needed a fast, non-PCI-E board (video card is still AGP!), so I pounced on the first mobo I found.
Nickface wrote:To be honest, I really didn't look for anything else. My sitpulations were that I needed a fast, non-PCI-E board (video card is still AGP!), so I pounced on the first mobo I found.
erm, it's a bit late but there's a ton of nForce3 boards...
Deject, stop arguing as fas as Intel/AMD goes, it's pointless, we've all heard it hundreds of times.
As far as i'm concerned, a CPU is a CPU for most people and while the performance differences can be noticable in some benchmarks, they'll make little different in reality.
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Deject, stop arguing as fas as Intel/AMD goes, it's pointless, we've all heard it hundreds of times.
As far as i'm concerned, a CPU is a CPU for most people and while the performance differences can be noticable in some benchmarks, they'll make little different in reality.
Dr. kitteny berk wrote:Deject, stop arguing as fas as Intel/AMD goes, it's pointless, we've all heard it hundreds of times.
As far as i'm concerned, a CPU is a CPU for most people and while the performance differences can be noticable in some benchmarks, they'll make little different in reality.
And as purdy as HL2 and the rest look now, i'm not going to complain.