Spec me a machine bitches
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
Shame really, the best new amd cores are out the start of next year, so you can get a phenom now, but if you wait, you'll get a better phenom, which will still be shitter than core 2 duo, but better than the phenoms that have been released.
Also, the phenoms are all over the k8 architecture of the older 64+ x2's, so if you need amd, I say phenom phenom phenom or you'll lose out massively on monies and power.
They are having to price the same as intel, or no-one (except you) would buy them, so you'll get a phenom for close to x2 price as well. But you should still get c2d.
Also remember am2+ if you get a phenom (which you should) because normal am2 boards can't cope properly with the quad core powah!!1
Also, the phenoms are all over the k8 architecture of the older 64+ x2's, so if you need amd, I say phenom phenom phenom or you'll lose out massively on monies and power.
They are having to price the same as intel, or no-one (except you) would buy them, so you'll get a phenom for close to x2 price as well. But you should still get c2d.
Also remember am2+ if you get a phenom (which you should) because normal am2 boards can't cope properly with the quad core powah!!1
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Dunno when that edit appeared.Hehulk wrote:Ah ha! Missed that
Thanks Berk
EDIT: Right, what I'm about to order
CPU
Motherboard
Graphics (Specs look better than the X1950 Pro for only a few pennies more)
RAM
Plus Berks find, comes to £291 with P&P, which I'm not too upset about
But the ATI HD cards are horrible, the x1900 (IIRC) is actually better, and less power hungry.
all of that. hard.HereComesPete wrote:Shame really, the best new amd cores are out the start of next year, so you can get a phenom now, but if you wait, you'll get a better phenom, which will still be shitter than core 2 duo, but better than the phenoms that have been released.
Also, the phenoms are all over the k8 architecture of the older 64+ x2's, so if you need amd, I say phenom phenom phenom or you'll lose out massively on monies and power.
They are having to price the same as intel, or no-one (except you) would buy them, so you'll get a phenom for close to x2 price as well. But you should still get c2d.
Also remember am2+ if you get a phenom (which you should) because normal am2 boards can't cope properly with the quad core powah!!1
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
Again,HereComesPete wrote:Hehulk, you wanted help, I really don't want to sound like a Danny Baker but you've ignored the help and your buying old tech at well over the odds because of it. An am2+ board, a phenom and a 8800gt would cost you a few pounds more, and would last you a lot longer and be a lot better. But it's up to you.
However, I've learned that some people like to ask for advice, then ignore it and buy crap. I consider this natural selection for hardware.
I wish hehulk the best of luck with his june upgrade.
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
Get this 8800gt from overclockers if you want a great card at bugger all money.
-
- Berk
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 17:02
- Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contact:
thisLee wrote:
Get an ATI HD 3850, it'll be far better than that for not much more money.
or
this.HereComesPete wrote:Get this 8800gt from overclockers if you want a great card at bugger all money.
stay far far far away from 2600's. they're beyond shit. imagine your wallet is being invited over to the Neverland Ranch by a geriatric Michael Jackson. The Radeon HD 3850 is an order of magnitude faster than a 2600XT.
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
skip SLI. always. it's just crap.amblin wrote:/eyeing up a quad core and dual 8800s blog
*slaps self for looking at another £700 of hardware*
on a sidenote, the new 8800GTSes will be out in about 2 weeks, from what i've heard, they're likely to be G92/65nm a'la 8800GT, but faster. (potentially fast enough to make the 8800GTX look bad)
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
I think it works out at about 40%-ish. (best case)Hehulk wrote:I think (And Berk will be here in a sec to correct me) but the 5-10% increase you get in FPS, in some games, just doesn't really make sence when your spending twice as much. It's improvement, but shit improvement over what you'd expect.
In theory, more cards doing less work is great. but the drivers are a real problem. because they're shit. not to mention, you can't multimon in SLI. which is bollocks.
if you have money to burn, you're better off buying one fast card and spending the rest on a better CPU and more rams.
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact:
-
- Throbbing Cupcake
- Posts: 10249
- Joined: February 17th, 2007, 23:05
- Location: The maleboge
-
- Morbo
- Posts: 19676
- Joined: December 10th, 2004, 21:53
- Contact: